Solving a Second-Order Differential Equation with Variable Coefficients

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
12 replies · 2K views
der.physika
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Solve the Differential Equation [tex]2yy\prime\prime+2xy\prime=0[/tex]

set [tex]p=y\prime[/tex], and then it becomes case 1 in the textbook

Can someone please help me solve this? It's a night mare
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ideasrule said:
Doesn't that simplify to y=-x?

Did you consider the
[tex]y\prime[/tex] that it's not the same as [tex]y[/tex]
 
der.physika said:
Did you consider the y' that it's not the same as y
What's your point? y' is a common factor in the equation you wrote. Did you not post the problem correctly?
der.physika said:
Solve the Differential Equation [tex]2yy\prime+2xy\prime=0[/tex]

set [tex]p=y\prime[/tex], and then it becomes case 1 in the textbook
You do realize we don't know what textbook you're using and even less likely to have a copy, right?
 
vela said:
What's your point? y' is a common factor in the equation you wrote. Did you not post the problem correctly?

You do realize we don't know what textbook you're using and even less likely to have a copy, right?

Okay, objection 1 makes no sense... but I'll give you you're right for objection 2.

Here's what the textbook says for case 1:

[tex]y\prime=p, y\prime\prime=p\prime\mbox {Dependent variable y missing}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
vela said:
Really? You don't see how x=-y is a solution to 2yy'+2xy'=2y'(x+y)=0?

How did you get that solution besides canceling things out?

Cause, this is like a very annoying class, like what method did you use? Did you use [tex]p\equiv{y}\prime[/tex]
 
Last edited:
vela said:
You get that solution by canceling things out. It's not the only solution to the original equation, however.

could you possibly do it, by using the substitution I posted?
 
ok I posted this wrong, i feel stupid

[tex]2yy\prime\prime+2xy\prime=0[/tex]

how do I solve this?

give me a hint maybe?
 
What's the point of the 2's? I would have just canceled them out from the beginning.

(Y*Y'')/Y' = -X

(Y''/Y')(Y) = -X

Set P = Y', then:

(P'/P)Integral(P) = -X

Ok, I'm sorry. This is going nowhere. Given me 24 hours to think about it.