MHB Solving Algebra equation 3x=15

  • Thread starter Thread starter Victor23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
Victor23
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please help me with this equation 3x =15
My workings ;3x=15

Any help is appreciated, thanks
= 5x, as 15 divide by 3x=5x
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
3x = 15

x = 15/3

x = 5
 
Victor23 said:
Can anyone please help me with this equation 3x =15
My workings ;3x=15

Any help is appreciated, thanks
= 5x, as 15 divide by 3x=5x
This makes no sense! In the first place, what does it mean to divide by an equation?
In the second place, 3x is NOT equal to 5x unless x= 0. There is nothing here that says either x= 0 or 3x= 5x.

To "solve for x" means to get x by itself: "x= something".

In the original equation, 3x= 15, x is not "by itself" because it is multiplied by 3. To get x "by itself" we need to "undo" that- and we undo "multiply by 3" by dividing by 3. And, of course, anything we do to one side of the equation we must do to the other.

Rather than "15 divided by 3x= 5x" you should have said "15 divided by 3 is 5".
Dividing both sides of 3x= 15 by 3 gives
(3x)/3= 15/3

x= 5.
 
HallsofIvy has given the correct advice for solving this equation ... but ... I'm going to take an epsilon amount of issue with one phrase ... "anything we do to one side of the equation we must do to the other". I've said this myself in Algebra classes but I paid for it once. I had a student solve an equation in the following way:

$$\dfrac{x-1}{6}=\dfrac{1}{3}$$

$$\dfrac{x}{6}=\dfrac{2}{3}$$

$$x = \dfrac{2}{3} \cdot 6 = 4$$

When I pressed him on what he did, he said "in the second step I added one to the numerator of both sides of the equation and anything I do to one side of an equation must be done to the other side of the equation ... which is what you said ... so it must be correct."
 
Thank you! I would argue that "adding 1 to the numerator" is "doing something" to the numerator, not to the "left side of the equation".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
51
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top