Solving an equation involving factorials

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr. Seafood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorials
Dr. Seafood
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
Splitting the reciprocal of a factorial into a sum of reciprocals of positive integer

I'm interested in finding all positive integers x, y such that {1 \over x} + {1 \over y} = {1 \over N!}, N \in \mathbb{N}. I think it's best to gather as many properties of solutions as possible, to make this problem as computationally simple as possible. I'm not sure if there's a closed form solution for (x, y) here. This is trivial for small N, but let's take N > 2.

If x, y are solutions for a given N!, we immediately get {{x + y} \over {xy}} = {1 \over N!} \implies {{xy} \over {x + y}} = N!. Since the right-side is an integer, we get x + y \mod xy = 0. Also, x = y always gives the solution x = y = 2N!, so let's assume without losing generality that x > y > 1.

Anything else ...? Maybe even a rapid solution?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Without loss of generality, we can assume that x>y., But then

\frac{2}{y}\geq \frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}=\frac{1}{N!}

So 2N!\geq y.

So this shows that there are a finite number of solutions, and that all solutions must have

y\in \{1,2,...,2N!\}

Of course, this is only a small step and won't help in solving the general case.
 
No, the number of solutions is a pretty cool result. Thanks!
 


Dr. Seafood said:
I'm interested in finding all positive integers x, y such that {1 \over x} + {1 \over y} = {1 \over N!}, N \in \mathbb{N}. I think it's best to gather as many properties of solutions as possible, to make this problem as computationally simple as possible. I'm not sure if there's a closed form solution for (x, y) here. This is trivial for small N, but let's take N > 2.

If x, y are solutions for a given N!, we immediately get {{x + y} \over {xy}} = {1 \over N!} \implies {{xy} \over {x + y}} = N!. Since the right-side is an integer, we get x + y \mod xy = 0. Also, x = y always gives the solution x = y = 2N!, so let's assume without losing generality that x > y > 1.

Anything else ...? Maybe even a rapid solution?
For a given N, whenever {-yN! \over N! - y} is an integer you should have a solution. Just solved for x.
 
OK, let's delve some deeper. I suggest reading http://mathcircle.berkeley.edu/BMC4/Handouts/elliptic/node4.html

In general, you want to know the integer solutions to

N! x+N! y-xy=0

You already know such a solution (0,0). Now there's an easy way to find all the rational solutions (of which there are infinitely many).

We consider all lines through (0,0) with rational slope. These lines have the form y=tx or x=0. Each of these lines will intersect our conic in another point, which will be rational. In fact, let's calculate the intersection of y=tx and our conic N! x+N! y-xy=0

Substiting y=tx in the equation of the conic yields

N! x+t N! x- tx^2=0

Thus

x((1+t)N!-tx)=0

thus x=0 or x=\frac{(1+t)N!}{t}. The corresponding y is y=(1+t)N!.

So all the rational solutions are of the form

x=\frac{(1+t)N!}{t}~\text{and}~y=(1+t)N!

with t rational.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top