Solving an ordinary differential equation.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the choice of t=0 as a lower limit in solving an ordinary differential equation (ODE). It is noted that this choice is conventional and simplifies the integration process by allowing the use of known initial conditions, such as y(0)=1. The integration from 0 to t facilitates the application of the fundamental theorem of calculus, making it easier to solve for y(t) without explicitly calculating the constant of integration. Alternative lower limits can be used, but they complicate the determination of the constant. Overall, using t=0 streamlines the solution process in ODEs.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is an example from the book:

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/64325990/MATH%20255/EX%204.PNG


Does anyone know why they chose t to be equal to 0?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's just convention. Once my DE book used the general x0 as the lower limit (where the independent variable was x).
 
theBEAST said:

Homework Statement


Here is an example from the book:

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/64325990/MATH%20255/EX%204.PNG


Does anyone know why they chose t to be equal to 0?

Thanks!

The point t=0 is special, because the initial condition was given there. However, in the integral you could choose any specific lower limit you want; that would just change the needed value of c. For example, we could choose the lower limit = 2. Then we would have
e^{t^2/4}y= \int_2^t e^{s^2/4}\, ds + c,
so we would determine c by equating e^0 y(0) = y(0) = 1 to
\int_2^0 e^{s^2/4}\, ds + c, to get
c = 1 - \int_2^0 e^{s^2/4}\, ds = 1 + \int_0^2 e^{s^2/4}\, ds, and this gives
y = e^{-t^2/4} \left[1 + \int_0^2 e^{s^2/4}\, ds + \int_2^t e^{s^2/4}\, ds \right]\\<br /> \;\;\; = e^{-t^2/4}\left[1 + \int_0^t e^{s^2/4}\, ds \right]. You would have gotten this right away if you had used 0 in the lower limit right from the start.

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To add to what others have said, you can write the step before you integrate as$$
(e^{\frac {t^2} 4}y)' = e^{\frac {t^2} 4}$$
Now by the fundamental theorem of calculus if you integrate from 0 to t you get $$
e^{\frac {t^2} 4}y(t)-e^0y(0)=\int_0^te^{\frac {s^2} 4}ds$$The point of using 0 for the lower limit is you know ##y(0)=1##, and it is a simple step to solve for ##y(t)##.
 
I find the neatest way to impose the initial conditions is by using definite integration of both LHS and RHS. The lower bounds correspond to the initial conditions, the upper are left variable. This way you never have to bother to calculate the constant of integration explicitly.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K