Solving Buoyancy Problems: Finding Mass & Volume of Unknown Block

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eddieb340
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around solving a buoyancy problem involving an unknown block, where participants explore methods to determine its mass and volume without directly measuring them. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, experimental approaches, and the implications of buoyant forces in different environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes measuring the mass of the block in air and water to find its density, but questions how to account for the buoyant force of air affecting the measurements.
  • Another participant asserts that the block's true mass does not change regardless of its environment, prompting a clarification on the definitions of variables in the buoyancy equations.
  • A participant outlines the buoyancy equations used and expresses difficulty in isolating the true mass and volume due to the influence of buoyant forces in both air and water.
  • One suggestion involves setting up two equations based on different experimental conditions (immersed in air only and in both air and water) to create a system of equations that could potentially solve for the unknowns.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principles of buoyancy and the need to account for buoyant forces, but there is no consensus on the best method to isolate the true mass and volume of the block, as multiple approaches and interpretations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the effects of buoyant forces in different media and the implications for measuring mass and volume. There are unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions that affect the clarity of the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and educators in physics or engineering who are exploring buoyancy concepts, experimental design, and the implications of measurement in fluid environments.

eddieb340
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I've got an interesting question about a Buoyancy problem we were given in Lab today. We were given an unknown block and we were asked to find its density without directly measuring its volume.
So we found the mass in air and in water.

Mass in air was 267.65g
Mass in water was 237.76g

Then using the equation T+Bwater=mg we found the volume of the block.
We then found the density using density = m/V.

My desnity came out to be 8.58x103 kg/m3

He then said that because we didn't account for the buoyant force of air that our density will be off a bit. So my question is how would you find the exact mass and volume of the unknown block if they BOTH change with no buoyant force. I am always left with two variables that I can't find no matter how many different ways i try to combine equations. Is there a different approach? Its like trying to find the mass and volume of my unknown block in a vacuum but I don't have one :(

Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The block's mass doesn't really change...no matter where it is. Sooo...?

What is that equation? It must have units of force, so B_water must be the buoyant force due to the water. So, what is T?

Exactly what procedure did you follow to make these measurements?
 
I understand that the true mass of the block never changes but we can't directly measure the true mass due to the buoyancy force of air.

T + Bwater = mg

In the above equation the mg was recorded by weighing the block in air. The T was recorded by weighing the block in water and the B was the difference of the two.

Bwater = mg - T

So since B also equals pgV we can say

ph2ogVdis = mg - T

you can solve this for V and then plug into p=m/v

So I have the density of the block in air. But not taking into account that the mass and volume that i used to calculate the density was calculated ignoring the Buoyant for in Air

SO...

I decided to set up another equation T + Bair = Mtrueg

Then... T+pairgVdis= true mgheres the problem. I can't get the true mass of the object without using the true volume of the displaced fluid (volume of the block) because both the mass of an object and its volume is affected by buoyant force. (think of the volume change in air compared to the bottom of the ocean)

did i leave anything out?

true density = true mass/true volume
or
density in vacuum = mass in vacuum/volume in vacuum
 
Last edited:
Okay, how about this? You can get two equations in two unknowns, because you have two situations in your experiment:

1. Block is immersed in air only...its apparent weight is the difference between its weight and the buoyant force due to air on it.

2. Block is immersed in BOTH air and water. Its apparent weight is its weight minus the two buoyant forces.

I will use the letter w for weight, B for buoyant force

Situation 1:

[tex]w_{\textrm{air}} + B_{\textrm{air}} = mg[/tex]

[tex]B_{\textrm{air}} = mg - w_{\textrm{air}}[/tex]

[tex]\rho_{\textrm{air}}gV = (m - m_{\textrm{air}})g[/tex]

where m_air is the mass that would be required to have the "apparent weight" that you measured.

[tex]V = \frac{m - m_{\textrm{air}}}{\rho_{\textrm{air}}}[/tex]

Similarly for situation 2:

[tex]B_{\textrm{air}} + B_{\textrm{water}} = mg - w_{\textrm{water}}[/tex]

divide both sides by g:

[tex](\rho_{\textrm{air}} + \rho_{\textrm{water}})V = m - m_{\textrm{water}}[/tex]

In words, this equation says that the total mass of displaced fluid (left hand side) is what accounts for the difference between the true mass and the apparent mass in water (where the apparent mass is the mass for the object that you would deduce from its weight if you naively assumed that it wasn't immersed in any fluid).

Since you already have an expression for V in terms of m and known constants (from situation 1), you can substitute that expression for V into this latest equation and solve for m.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K