Solving Complex Fourier Series Problem - Help Needed!

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a complex Fourier series problem involving the addition and subtraction of exponential terms. A user identifies an error in a textbook related to the expression involving exponentials, specifically pointing out a typo where π should be π/2. Another participant confirms this error and clarifies that for integer n, the terms simplify to eliminate the erroneous part. The conversation also touches on the correct trigonometric identities, emphasizing the distinction between cosine and sine representations. Overall, the thread provides a collaborative effort to resolve confusion around the Fourier series calculations.
Jag1972
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hello Folks,
I have a problem understanding a step of the complex Fourier series; it’s a step which involves simple addition and subtraction of exponentials (regrettably not simple for me).
I have attached a picture of the step I am having a problem with would really appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction.
Jag.
 

Attachments

  • ourier.JPG
    ourier.JPG
    53.4 KB · Views: 467
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes there is indeed an error in that text, and it's in the line immediately following the one you marked with an asterisk.

The line following the one you marked should read (for simplicity I'll just give the bracketed part of the expression) :

( \, \, 2\, \exp(j n \pi/2) - 2\, \exp(-j n \pi/2) - [ \exp(j n \pi) - \exp(-j n \pi) ] \, \, )

This is simply collecting like terms right. Note however that for integer "n" that exp(j n Pi) is equal to exp(-j n Pi) so the "[]" term on the end goes to zero leaving just :

(\, 2\,\exp(j n \pi/2) - 2\,\exp(-j n \pi/2) \, )

This is what should have been shown in the bracketed term of the line following the one you indicated. Note that the book has a typo where they used Pi instead of Pi/2, but the Pi/2 magically reappears correctly in the final answer that follows.

So essentially it's just a typo on the part of the book. Does that clear it up for you?
 
Last edited:
UART: Thank you very much I was pulling my hair out trying to work it out. I have attached my working out following your reply is this right (I have shown the trig identities). Thanks :)
 

Attachments

UART: I have attached it as a JPEG as I think you may have to save the PDF to open.
 

Attachments

  • Fourier.JPG
    Fourier.JPG
    16.8 KB · Views: 460
Almost right.

Where you wrote :

"where cos(q) = (exp(jq) + exp(-jq))/2"

it would have made a lot more sense if you had of written :

"where j sin(q) = (exp(jq) - exp(-jq))/2
 
UART: Thanks again I wrote the wrong identity down doh! Its got to be sin\theta

Thanks again UART :)
 
Thread 'I thought it was only Amazon that sold unsafe junk'
I grabbed an under cabinet LED light today at a big box store. Nothing special. 18 inches in length and made to plug several lights together. Here is a pic of the power cord: The drawing on the box led me to believe that it would accept a standard IEC cord which surprised me. But it's a variation of it. I didn't try it, but I would assume you could plug a standard IEC cord into this and have a double male cord AKA suicide cord. And to boot, it's likely going to reverse the hot and...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K