Solving Confusing Indices in Operator Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter countable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Indices
countable
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is a stupid question but I really want to understand this.

If we have an operator that's defined in the following way:

D_\mu \phi^a = \partial_\mu \phi^a - iA^{r}_{\mu}{(T_r)^a}_b\phi^b

How would we go about working out:

D_\mu D_\nu \phi^a

What's confusing me is that the operator D acts on one component of the scalar (the gauge field) on the LHS, but acts on two components of the scalar on the RHS.

FYI: the "answer" is that D_\mu D_\nu\phi^a=(\partial_\mu{\delta^a}_b - iA^{r}_{\mu}{(T_r)^a}_b)(\partial_\nu{\delta^b}_c - iA^{s}_{\nu}{(T_s)^b}_c)\phi^c

How does the above expression come about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing to realize is that the your differential operators has two indices:

D_\mu \equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}}.​

Therefore, the combination D_\mu\phi^a is really

D_\mu\phi^a\equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}}\phi^b.​

With this in mind, it should be pretty clear that

D_\mu D_\nu \phi^a\equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}} (D_\nu)^b_{\phantom{b}{c}}\phi^c.​

Does that help?
 
thanks that was a good explanation:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top