Solving Confusing Indices in Operator Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter countable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Indices
countable
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is a stupid question but I really want to understand this.

If we have an operator that's defined in the following way:

D_\mu \phi^a = \partial_\mu \phi^a - iA^{r}_{\mu}{(T_r)^a}_b\phi^b

How would we go about working out:

D_\mu D_\nu \phi^a

What's confusing me is that the operator D acts on one component of the scalar (the gauge field) on the LHS, but acts on two components of the scalar on the RHS.

FYI: the "answer" is that D_\mu D_\nu\phi^a=(\partial_\mu{\delta^a}_b - iA^{r}_{\mu}{(T_r)^a}_b)(\partial_\nu{\delta^b}_c - iA^{s}_{\nu}{(T_s)^b}_c)\phi^c

How does the above expression come about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing to realize is that the your differential operators has two indices:

D_\mu \equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}}.​

Therefore, the combination D_\mu\phi^a is really

D_\mu\phi^a\equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}}\phi^b.​

With this in mind, it should be pretty clear that

D_\mu D_\nu \phi^a\equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}} (D_\nu)^b_{\phantom{b}{c}}\phi^c.​

Does that help?
 
thanks that was a good explanation:)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top