Solving Differential Equation: Substitution Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Vitaly-
  • Start date Start date
-Vitaly-
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve: http://img384.imageshack.us/img384/60/clipboard01az7.jpg

Homework Equations


DE stuff

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by doing substitution: x=U+3/2 and y=W-1/2

So, it gave me http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/3172/clipboard02ly8.jpg ,[/URL] but http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/8297/clipboard03db9.jpg ,[/URL] so http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/3223/clipboard04xt2.jpg .[/URL]

Therefore, http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/2264/clipboard05iu8.jpg

And, http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/615/clipboard06ez2.jpg .[/URL] Substitution z=W/U. Giving, http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/5639/clipboard07hb7.jpg (*).

And, http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/2373/clipboard08qj2.jpg

Rearranging gives http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/1830/clipboard09tm2.jpg .[/URL] Substitute in (*)

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/8541/clipboard10bz2.jpg => http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/6706/clipboard11ao0.jpg => http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/8163/clipboard12ee3.jpg

Dividing 1/(1+z2) and -z/(1+z2) and integrating gives:

http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/3638/clipboard13nj5.jpg .[/URL] But now I'm stuck :( because I can't solve this for z and go back to y and x :( maybe I made an arithmetical mistake or maybe there is a better method?
Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how correct the method you detailed is but a lot of times for a differential equation, an implicit solution is sufficient.
 
Surely there is a way to solve it explicitely
 
Why "surely". You don't need to solve
arctan z-\frac{1}{2}ln(z^2+ 1)= ln(U)+ C

z= W/U so that is
arctan W/U-\frac{1}{2}ln(\frac{W^2}{U^2}+ 1)= ln(U)+ C
and U= x- 3/2, W= y+ 1/2 so
arctan\frac{y+ 1/2}{x-3/2}- \frac{1}{2}ln(\frac{(y+1/2)^2}{(x-3/2)^2}= ln(x- 3/2)+ C
That's a perfectly good solution. (Assuming your integration was correct.)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top