Solving Equations: Understanding Factoring and Finding Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
AI Thread Summary
The equation x(x-3)² = 0 can be factored to x(x-3)(x-3) = 0, yielding solutions x = 0 and x = 3, with 3 being a root of multiplicity 2. This multiplicity affects the graph's shape, showing a linear behavior near x = 0 and a parabolic shape near x = 3. While there are technically three solutions, they can be summarized as x = 3 and x = 0 without repeating the root of 3. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding multiplicity in relation to graph behavior. Overall, the interaction highlights effective teaching and learning dynamics in solving equations.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
So let's say I have an equation

x(x-3)2 = 0

I can factor it out to x(x-3)(x-3) = 0

Since there are two 3's in parenthesis, does this mean that the answers are

x1 = 3
x2 = 3
and
x3 = 0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes! :smile:
 
Femme_physics said:
So let's say I have an equation

x(x-3)2 = 0

I can factor it out to x(x-3)(x-3) = 0

Since there are two 3's in parenthesis, does this mean that the answers are

x1 = 3
x2 = 3
and
x3 = 0
Yes, but you can also say that the solutions are x = 3 and x = 0. If you want to be picky, you can say that 3 is a root of multiplicity 2 of your equation.

Multiplicity of roots plays a role in the shape of a graph. For y = x(x-3)2, the x-intercepts are at x = 0 and x = 3. Since the multiplicity of the root at 0 is one, the graph of this equation looks a lot like the graph of y = x for x near 0.

Since the multiplicity of the root at 3 is two, the graph of this equation looks like the graph of y = (x - 3)2 for x near 3. IOW, near 3 the graph of the original equation looks like a parabola whose vertex is at (3, 0), and that opens upward. For values of x that aren't close to 3 and aren't close to 0, the effects of the cubic equation are dominant over the local effects near 0 and 3.
 
I like Serena said:
Yes! :smile:
Wait, so there are 3 solutions, but since two of the solutions are the same, can I say
x1 = 3
and
x2 = 0

Without writing 3 two times as the answer?
 
Yes, but you can also say that the solutions are x = 3 and x = 0
That'd be better! And thanks for the rest of the explanation! :)
 
Femme_physics said:
Wait, so there are 3 solutions, but since two of the solutions are the same, can I say
x1 = 3
and
x2 = 0

Without writing 3 two times as the answer?

Again yes! :smile:

You appear to understand perfectly! :)
 
I love it how you always make me feel awesome, ILS, even for simple stuff. You're an exemplary teacher and mentor! :)
 
Femme_physics said:
I love it how you always make me feel awesome, ILS, even for simple stuff. You're an exemplary teacher and mentor! :)

I like the feedback :smile:
I'm learning here too you know!
Trying to earn a superhero homework helper suit (with a big "HH" at front and undies over costume-- yep) :P
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top