How to Solve Exponential Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter froilan041
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
To solve the exponential equations 2^(x-1) - 2^x = 2^(-3) and 3^(x+1) + 3^x = 36, the first equation can be simplified by factoring out 2^(x-1), leading to an impossible scenario since -1/8 is not in the range of 2^x. For the second equation, it can be rearranged to 3^x(3 + 1) = 36, which simplifies to 3^x = 9, resulting in x = 2. The key techniques involve factoring and recognizing the properties of exponential functions. Understanding these methods is essential for solving similar exponential equations effectively.
froilan041
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anyone show me how to solve the following equations:

2^(x-1)-2^(x)=2^(-3)

3^(x+1)+3^(x)=36

I would greatly appreciate your assistance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2x-1=2x*2-1.

It should be a bit easier now.
 
Here is a general way to solve things like this
1. 2^{x-1}-2^{x} = 2^{-3}
Now factor out a 2^{x-1}
2^{x-1}(1 - 2) = 2^{3} \rightarrow 2^{x - 1} = -\frac{1}{8}
You can take the logarithm at this point or you could notice that -\frac{1}{8}<br /> is out of the range of 2^{x}

Similar approach
2. 3^{x+1} + 3^{x} = 36 \rightarrow<br /> 3^{x}(3 + 1) = 36 \rightarrow<br /> 3^{x} = 9 \rightarrow<br /> x = 2
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top