Solving Finite Series: \sum_{l=0}^{k-1} (r+l)^j (r+l-k)^i

  • Thread starter Thread starter ekkilop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Series
ekkilop
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I've encountered the series below:

\sum_{l=0}^{k-1} (r+l)^j (r+l-k)^i

where r, k, i, j are positive integers and i \leq j.
I am interested in expressing this series as a polynomial in k - or rather - finding the coefficients of that polynomial as i,j changes. I have reasons to believe that all terms with even exponent will vanish though I cannot readily see it from the expression above.

I have made some feeble attempts at expressing this in terms of well known functions. The most promising seems to be in terms of Bernoulli polynomials due to the large number of catalogued identities for these functions, though I haven't found a suitable one;

\frac{1}{(i+1)(j+1)} \sum_{l=0}^{k-1} [B_{j+1}(r+l+1) - B_{j+1}(r+l)][B_{i+1}(r+l-k+1) - B_{i+1}(r+l-k)]

Anyway, I cannot see how to proceed from here.
Any ideas or insights would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ekkilop said:
I have reasons to believe that all terms with even exponent will vanish though I cannot readily see it from the expression above.
I found a counterexample: i=2, j=3, r does not matter. You get k^6 (and maybe k^2, depends on r) as term.
WolframAlpha query

I have no idea how to simplify the sum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top