Solving Fluid Dynamics Problem: Granite Floating in Mercury & Water

AI Thread Summary
A fluid dynamics problem involving granite floating at the interface of mercury and water requires understanding the balance of forces acting on the granite. The key principle is Archimedes' principle, which states that the mass of the fluid displaced equals the mass of the object displacing it. The discussion reveals the relationship between the volumes of granite submerged in water and mercury, leading to the equation (V1/V2) = (ρ2 - ρ) / (ρ - ρ1). The participants clarify that the mass of granite is equal to the sum of the masses of the displaced fluids, allowing for the derivation of the volume ratio. This understanding is crucial for solving the fluid dynamics problem effectively.
Genericcoder
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Hi I am solving some problems in fluid dynamics I came to this problem that I don't understand how to solve it.


A piece of granite floats at the interface of mercury and water contained in a beaker (Fig.). If the densities of granite, water and mercury are ρ, ρ1 and ρ2 respectively, the ratio of the volume of granite in water to the volume in mercury is
(a) (ρ2 – ρ) /(ρ – ρ1)
(b) (ρ2 + ρ) /(ρ+ ρ1)
(c) ρ1 ρ2 /ρ
(d) ρ1 /ρ2
(e) ρ2 /ρ1

figure of problem is here -->
http://www.apphysicsresources.com/2009/07/ap-physics-b-multiple-choice-questions.html



I tried to approach it like this. we know that the granite will sink so we know that the pressure that water will put on the granite until given height will be the same as buoyancy force of mercury,which is same as weight displaced.

But I couldn't solve it in the end in terms of those variables I don't also understand the derivation in that link.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry to bump this but I really need to understand this problem I hope this isn't against the rules.
 
Well start with Archimedes principle: The mass of the fluid displaced equals the mass of the object displacing the fluid.

The mass of the granite is
\rho (V_1 + V_2)

The mass of displaced water is
\rho_1 V_1

The mass of the displaced mercury is
\rho_2 V_2

So, we have
\rho (V_1 + V_2) = \rho_2 V_2 + \rho_1 V_1

\rho V_1 + \rho V_2 = \rho_2 V_2 + \rho_1 V_1

\left(\rho - \rho_1\right) V_1 = \left(\rho_2-\rho\right) V_2

\frac{V_1}{V_2} = \frac{\rho_2-\rho}{\rho - \rho_1}
 
I see so we just made the mass of granite to be the amount it displaces on water and the amount it displaces on mercury. that makes sense.
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top