Solving for (0.35)(0.025) Difference in 0.18676 and 0.175

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonseh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to calculating shear flow using the Q factor in a structural engineering context. Participants explore the appropriate areas to consider in their calculations and the implications of using different sections of the material.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether they can use the middle part of a section for their calculations instead of the right part, leading to a specific numerical result.
  • Another participant suggests that the calculation is incorrect due to a misunderstanding of the neutral axis dimension and proposes that the shear flow is affected by the number of shear planes.
  • A participant requests clarification on the implications of using the green area and its connection to the overall shear flow calculation.
  • There is a discussion about the correct application of the Q factor, with some participants asserting that the full area of the connected part should be used rather than just the area above or below the section of interest.
  • One participant emphasizes that the initial calculation error regarding the centroid distance must be corrected to achieve the right answer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate areas to use in the calculations and the implications of those choices. There is no consensus on the correctness of using the green area versus the full area of the connected part, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific calculations and definitions related to shear flow and the Q factor, indicating that there may be missing assumptions or dependencies on definitions that are not fully resolved in the discussion.

fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For this question , i am not sure how to get the Q , Can i use the middle part instead of the right part ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


if i use middle part , my ans would be (0.35)(0.025)(0.18676-0.175) = 1.03x10^-4 , which is different from the ans . Is it wrong ? If it's wrong , why can't i take the middle section ( green part) ?
 

Attachments

  • 509.PNG
    509.PNG
    42.7 KB · Views: 432
  • 510.PNG
    510.PNG
    8.9 KB · Views: 419
Physics news on Phys.org
fonseh said:

Homework Statement


For this question , i am not sure how to get the Q , Can i use the middle part instead of the right part ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


if i use middle part , my ans would be (0.35)(0.025)(0.18676-0.175) = 1.03x10^-4 , which is different from the ans . Is it wrong ? If it's wrong , why can't i take the middle section ( green part) ?
That is a good observation, you certainly can take the green part, but your calculation is wrong because the neutral axis dimension of 0.18676 is measured from the top and I think you measured from the bottom. If you adjust your calc accordingly, the shear flow is exactly twice the other method, because there are 2 shear planes in the bolts when you do it this way, so you must divide that value by 2 to determine the bolt shear force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
PhanthomJay said:
If you adjust your calc accordingly, the shear flow is exactly twice the other method,
Whta do you mean ? can you show it ?
 
PhanthomJay said:
That is a good observation, you certainly can take the green part, but your calculation is wrong because the neutral axis dimension of 0.18676 is measured from the top and I think you measured from the bottom. If you adjust your calc accordingly, the shear flow is exactly twice the other method, because there are 2 shear planes in the bolts when you do it this way, so you must divide that value by 2 to determine the bolt shear force.
why the area that we take not this area only ? refer to the attachment i uploaded ( green part) , i said so because when the planes area sheared , the green area is connected to the each other , right ?

Here's the definition of Q to support my answer
 

Attachments

  • 517.PNG
    517.PNG
    17.9 KB · Views: 429
fonseh said:
why the area that we take not this area only ? refer to the attachment i uploaded ( green part) , i said so because when the planes area sheared , the green area is connected to the each other , right ?

Here's the definition of Q to support my answer
No, the book has it right and you would have had it right in your first post if you had not made the calc error for y'_bar and not forgotten to divide by 2. The area you show in your last post is incorrect.
These shear flow problems can be challenging. You are taught that Q is calculated using the atea above or below he section of interest, but that does not apply for connected parts when you are looking for connection bolt stresses and not the wood itself stresses. You must use the full area of the connected part like you did in your original post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
PhanthomJay said:
No, the book has it right and you would have had it right in your first post if you had not made the calc error for y'_bar and not forgotten to divide by 2. The area you show in your last post is incorrect.
These shear flow problems can be challenging. You are taught that Q is calculated using the atea above or below he section of interest, but that does not apply for connected parts when you are looking for connection bolt stresses and not the wood itself stresses. You must use the full area of the connected part like you did in your original post.
do you meanit is correct also to use the green area , if i use the green area in the first post , i must divide it by 2 ?
 
fonseh said:
do you meanit is correct also to use the green area , if i use the green area in the first post , i must divide it by 2 ?
Yes! Redo it using the correct value for the distance from the centroid of your area to the neutral axis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K