Solving for multiple unkowns using KVL and KCL equations

AI Thread Summary
To solve for vX, PDEV by iS1, and P ABS by vS3 using KVL and KCL, the discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying node voltages and relationships between components. The user suggests starting by selecting a ground node and labeling other nodes to write equations based on the circuit's configuration. They note that the voltage at node D is crucial and can be expressed in terms of vQ. Despite several attempts, the user encounters trivial solutions with zero coefficients, indicating potential errors in their equations or assumptions. The complexity of the circuit, particularly with controlled sources, adds to the challenge of finding a solution.
fredro
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am asked to solve for vX, PDEV BY iS1, P ABS BY vS3 (please see attached figure). We have only covered KCL, KVL, Ohm's law and Power in class. No Thevinen theorem, so it can't be used to help solve.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that current will not pass through the 4 Ohm resistor or vS4. My initial hunch was to solve for iQ in terms of vS1 (upper left of figure) and then use that equation to help solve for a KVL with the 3 and 7 ohm resistors and vS3. The result was not pretty and very wrong.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit 1.png
    Circuit 1.png
    10.8 KB · Views: 665
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, it's going to get messy. There are a lot of interrelationships to account for with all the controlled sources. However, to make a start, choose a ground node, label the other important nodes, and see what you can do about writing equations for their voltages in terms of the given information. Here's a suggestion:
attachment.php?attachmentid=38590&stc=1&d=1315258755.gif


The voltage at node D (which is the same as -vQ) will be important. You can write a KCL equation for that node.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    13.4 KB · Views: 829
Here's what I have so far. Unfortunately, I keep running into nonsensical, trivial answers where my systems keep having coefficients of zero. :confused: I've spent several hours on this problem.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit 1.png
    Circuit 1.png
    22.2 KB · Views: 590
Watch out for the polarities of things. The diagram shows vQ to be the negative of the voltage at your KCL1 node (note the +/- sign locations).

Suppose you take the voltage at node D to be vD. Then v_Q = -v_D. Can you write expressions for the node voltages at A and B (with respect to the ground node that I indicated) in terms of this vD ? (You may need to keep vx as a variable for now).
 
Here's what I have so far. Unfortunately, I keep running into nonsensical, trivial answers where my systems keep having coefficients of zero. :confused: I've spent several hours on this problem.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top