Solving for Muon Speed & Neutrino Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of the muon and the energy of the neutrino from the decay of a pion at rest. It emphasizes using conservation laws for momentum and energy, leading to an expression for the neutrino's energy. Participants express uncertainty about simplifying the calculations for the muon's momentum and energy without extensive algebra. Clarifications are provided regarding the mass of the neutrino, noting it can be neglected for these calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenge of balancing accuracy with computational simplicity in particle physics problems.
stefan10
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a) Consider that decay when the pion is at rest. Find the speed β of the muon and the energy E_{v} of the neutrino. (Work in general algebraic terms, and set c=1. Plug in numerical values as late as possible! You may find it useful to define a quantity r=m_{\pi}/m_{\mu}

Homework Equations



1. E^2 = M^2 + P^2

2. β_{\mu} = P_{\mu}/E_{\mu}

The Attempt at a Solution



By conservation of momentum P_{\mu} = - P_{\nu}

By conservation of energy E_{\mu} + E_{\nu} = m_{\pi}

Using Equation 1 and the fact the mass of the neutrino is zero. I go through algebra to get

E_{\nu} = \frac{m_{\pi}}{2} - \frac{m_{\mu}^2}{2 m_{\pi}}

I'm unsure how I can find the momentum and energy of the muon from there without going into long algebraic computations. Is there an easier way? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using Equation 1 and the fact the mass of the neutrino is zero.
You now the mass of the neutrino is not zero right? But it may be OK to neglect it.

I'm unsure how I can find the momentum and energy of the muon from there without going into long algebraic computations. Is there an easier way?
Not really. The hint is the shortcut.

Once you start you'll find the calculations are not all that bad.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top