MHB Solving for Tension of Inextensible String System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the tension in a system involving a light inextensible string over pulleys with different masses attached. The key equation to prove is t(1/m + 1/3m) = g, where t is the tension and g is gravity. Participants agree on the initial equations derived from applying Newton's second law to the masses involved, but one user struggles with the algebraic manipulation to reach the desired result. Another user provides a detailed step-by-step solution, confirming the correctness of the initial equations and guiding the original poster through the algebraic process. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic handling in mechanics problems.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
a light inextensible string passes over a fixed pulley A, under a movable pulley B of mass M and then over a second fixed pulley C. A mass m is attached to one end of the string and a mass 3m is attached to the other end. the system is released from rest. (i) prove that the tension t in the string is given by the equation t(1/m + 1/3m)=g (g stands for gravity) i can't prove this even though i feel like i am doing all the the right equations. the 3 equations i get by using f=ma and looking at all the particles seperately are t-mg=ma t-3mg=3mb Mg-2t=M(a/2 + b/2) a stands for the acceleration the particle of mass m. b stands for the acceleration of the particle of mass 3m. a/2 + b/2 stands for the acceleration . when i get a and b on there own from the first 2 equations and put this in for a and b in the last equation i do not get the answer required. i can post a picture of the diagram in the question if anyone needs it. any help much appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
a light inextensible string passes over a fixed pulley A, under a movable pulley B of mass M and then over a second fixed pulley C. A mass m is attached to one end of the string and a mass 3m is attached to the other end. the system is released from rest. (i) prove that the tension t in the string is given by the equation t(1/m + 1/3m)=g (g stands for gravity) i can't prove this even though i feel like i am doing all the the right equations. the 3 equations i get by using f=ma and looking at all the particles seperately are t-mg=ma t-3mg=3mb Mg-2t=M(a/2 + b/2) a stands for the acceleration the particle of mass m. b stands for the acceleration of the particle of mass 3m. a/2 + b/2 stands for the acceleration . when i get a and b on there own from the first 2 equations and put this in for a and b in the last equation i do not get the answer required. i can post a picture of the diagram in the question if anyone needs it. any help much appreciated

I am new to these forums and noticed your problem in the unanswered list so I thought I would have a look at it.
The good news is that your mechanics was good and I agree with your equations, you must have made a slip in their solution.
Here is my working.

(1) t - mg = ma
(2) t - 3mg = 3mb
3times equation (1) minus (2) gives (3) 2t = 3ma - 3mb

(4) Mg - 2t = M(a/2 + b/2) mutiply this by 6m (5) 6Mmg - 12mt = 3Mma +3Mmb
(5) + M times (3) gives (6) 6Mmg - 12mt + 2Mt = 6Mma

6M times equation (1) gives (7) 6Mt - 6Mmg = 6Mma
putting (6) and (7) together 6Mmg -12mt +2Mt = 6Mt - 6Mmg
rearranging 12Mmg = 12mt + 4Mt dividing this by 12Mm gives the result required.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Back
Top