Engineering Solving for the Reaction Force by taking Moment about a Point

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving for the reaction force at point D by taking moments about point B in a static equilibrium problem involving cables BA and BC. The original approach aimed to eliminate the tension forces in the cables but resulted in incorrect calculations. A more effective method suggested involves taking moments about point D to directly solve for the tensions in the cables. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately considering all forces and moments in the analysis, particularly the reaction forces at point D.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with Free Body Diagrams (FBD)
  • Knowledge of moment calculations in mechanics
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for clear mathematical representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of taking moments about different points in static systems
  • Learn how to construct and analyze Free Body Diagrams (FBD) effectively
  • Explore tension calculations in cable systems under static loads
  • Review LaTeX formatting for presenting mathematical equations clearly
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in structural analysis or static equilibrium problems will benefit from this discussion.

daisy7777
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The stiff-leg derrick used on ships is supported by a
ball-and-socket joint at D and two cables BA and BC. The
cables are attached to a smooth collar ring at B, which allows
rotation of the derrick about z axis. If the derrick supports a
crate having a mass of 200 kg, determine the tension in the
cables and the x, y, z components of reaction at D.
Relevant Equations
∑Fx=0; ∑Fy=0; ∑M=0; ∑Fz=0;
Screenshot 2024-10-21 143819.png
For this problem, I took the moment about point B to 'get rid' of the tension force in the cables BA and BC. By doing this, I figured I could solve for the x and y components of the reaction force at D. From there, I could solve for the tension in BA and BC in the x and y and then solve for Dz. However, I got the wrong answer doing this and when looking at a video they approached the problem by taking the moment at D and solving for the tension in both the cables from there. Was my approach wrong or did I simply make a mistake in my calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please share your work in a clear format (preferably using LaTeX Guide) ,and maybe we can figure out what happened. I have suspicion that you neglected the tensions and/or reaction at ##D## in the rigging attached to the mast when taking your moment about ##B##. In other words perhaps we should examine what you think is a FBD of the mast. Maybe you made no mistake in the physics and just have a math error (maybe position vector from ##B## to the tip of the boom). I can't tell.

There is nothing wrong with taking torques about ##B## in theory to get some equations. Maybe it's a shortcut ( I assume you think it is). It could be nothing special though too.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K