Engineering Solving for the Reaction Force by taking Moment about a Point

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the reaction force at point D by taking moments about point B to eliminate the tension forces in cables BA and BC. The original approach led to incorrect results, prompting a reevaluation of the method, particularly the suggestion to take moments at point D instead. Participants noted the importance of accurately accounting for tensions and reactions at point D when constructing free body diagrams. Theoretical validity of taking moments about point B is acknowledged, but potential calculation errors are also considered. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful analysis and verification of both the physics and calculations involved.
daisy7777
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The stiff-leg derrick used on ships is supported by a
ball-and-socket joint at D and two cables BA and BC. The
cables are attached to a smooth collar ring at B, which allows
rotation of the derrick about z axis. If the derrick supports a
crate having a mass of 200 kg, determine the tension in the
cables and the x, y, z components of reaction at D.
Relevant Equations
∑Fx=0; ∑Fy=0; ∑M=0; ∑Fz=0;
Screenshot 2024-10-21 143819.png
For this problem, I took the moment about point B to 'get rid' of the tension force in the cables BA and BC. By doing this, I figured I could solve for the x and y components of the reaction force at D. From there, I could solve for the tension in BA and BC in the x and y and then solve for Dz. However, I got the wrong answer doing this and when looking at a video they approached the problem by taking the moment at D and solving for the tension in both the cables from there. Was my approach wrong or did I simply make a mistake in my calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please share your work in a clear format (preferably using LaTeX Guide) ,and maybe we can figure out what happened. I have suspicion that you neglected the tensions and/or reaction at ##D## in the rigging attached to the mast when taking your moment about ##B##. In other words perhaps we should examine what you think is a FBD of the mast. Maybe you made no mistake in the physics and just have a math error (maybe position vector from ##B## to the tip of the boom). I can't tell.

There is nothing wrong with taking torques about ##B## in theory to get some equations. Maybe it's a shortcut ( I assume you think it is). It could be nothing special though too.
 
Last edited:
I have a question that I couldn’t fully understand its logic. The professor asked us to calculate the shear resistance and moment about the X and Y axis, using the given cross-section and the values of compressive and tensile stresses. I understand how to get the moment, but I’m confused about how to find the shear resistance from these stresses. Could you explain or clarify the method?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K