Solving for Time: Dropping a Brick from a Building

  • Thread starter Thread starter saiyajin822
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Time
AI Thread Summary
A brick is dropped from a building, and the discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for the brick to pass in front of a window that is 1.5 meters tall, located 20 meters below the drop point. The initial approach used the formula d = vit + 1/2at^2, but confusion arose regarding the correct application of initial velocity and distance. Participants suggested calculating the time to fall to both the top and bottom of the window, then finding the difference to determine the time spent in front of the window. The importance of visualizing the problem through a velocity-time graph was emphasized, despite some participants expressing frustration with graphing concepts. The method remains applicable even after correcting the window height, focusing on the difference in time calculations for the two distances.
saiyajin822
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
more kinetics :(

sigh here's another one i thought i knew how to do but i ended up with the wrong answer.

A brick is dropped from the roof of a building. Twenty meters below the point of release is the top of a window. How long will it take the brick to pass in front of the window which is 21.5 m tall?

d=21.5 m
a=9.8m/s
vi=0
t=?
i used d=vit+1/2a(t)^2 formula so..

21.5=0+1/2(9.8)(t)^2

did i do that right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
saiyajin822 said:
sigh here's another one i thought i knew how to do but i ended up with the wrong answer.

A brick is dropped from the roof of a building. Twenty meters below the point of release is the top of a window. How long will it take the brick to pass in front of the window which is 21.5 m tall?

d=21.5 m
a=9.8m/s
vi=0
t=?
i used d=vit+1/2a(t)^2 formula so..

21.5=0+1/2(9.8)(t)^2

did i do that right...

I'm afraid you may not have. I suggest that instead you might take the v_i as the velocity of the brick at the point where the brick passes the top of the window. (d=20m) Then your equation would work, but I'm just an idiot...
I thought about this for a second and realized a simpler method would be to simply take the difference in times of d=20m and d=41.5m. (Use your original formula set up and solve for time when d=20m then solve when d=41.5, then find the difference)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't like using formulae, and since I've not been taught more complicated kinematics at school yet, I'll do it the non-formulae way.

The brick has initial velocity of 0 m/s. When dropped, it accelerates towards the ground at 9.8 m/s^2. We want to find its velocity at the point where it reaches the top of the window. Visualise a velocity-time graph in your head. From the point of origin, you can draw a line that has gradient 9.8. We want to calculate just how far we can draw the line before the area underneath the line is 20m. Let's call the time needed to travel this distance t1. Then the velocity at this point will be 9.8t1. The area underneath the line is 1/2 x 9.8t1 x t1 = (9.8t1 ^2)/2.

So,
9.8t1 ^2 = 40
t1 = 2.020305089

Use the same method to determine the time taken for the brick to pass through both the 20 m before reaching the window and the height of the window itself (21.5m) which has a total distance of 41.5m. Call this time t2. Minus t1 from t2, and you'll have your answer.
 
I hate graphs. They are very annoying.

I'll plot them, but I just hate those who ask plot the following when x equals:

.9
.99
.999
.9999
1.1
1.01
1.001


It never ends!
 
WOW i mistyped the question, I am really sorry about that. the window is actually 1.5 m high. This is what the real problem should say:

A brick is dropped from the roof of a building. Twenty meters below the point of release is the top of a window. How long will it take the brick to pass in front of the window which is 1.5 m tall?

again,sorry

by the way, i did it the way u said but i don't understand why we would take the difference of using 20m and 21.5m.
 
Last edited:
JasonRox said:
I hate graphs. They are very annoying.

I'll plot them, but I just hate those who ask plot the following when x equals:

.9
.99
.999
.9999
1.1
1.01
1.001


It never ends!

I did not say 'plot a graph'. I said visualise the graph in your head, and you'll be able to solve the problem.
 
saiyajin822 said:
WOW i mistyped the question, I am really sorry about that. the window is actually 1.5 m high. This is what the real problem should say:

A brick is dropped from the roof of a building. Twenty meters below the point of release is the top of a window. How long will it take the brick to pass in front of the window which is 1.5 m tall?

again,sorry

by the way, i did it the way u said but i don't understand why we would take the difference of using 20m and 21.5m.

Even though the value has now changed, the method used in solving the question remains the same. Hence, if you understood my method for solving the initial problem, you should be able to tweak it to work for this problem as well.

In your original question, t1 is the time taken to fall from the roof to the top of the window. t2 is the time taken to fall from the roof to the bottom of the window. Hence to find the time taken to fall from the top of the window to the bottom of the window, you need to find the difference between t1 and t2.
 
Back
Top