Solving for Volume and Mass Absorption Coefficients in Foggy Astrophysics Class

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating volume and mass absorption coefficients for light emitted by streetlamps in foggy conditions. The observer notes that the radiation flux from the second lamp is five times that of the third, leading to initial calculations using the Beer-Lambert law. However, the accuracy of these results is questioned due to the non-homogeneous nature of fog and the directional emission of light from streetlamps. Suggestions include using the Mie scattering equation for better accuracy and taking measurements at various distances. Overall, the complexity of fog as a medium poses challenges in obtaining precise coefficients.
stuffy
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem...

Consider a row of isotropically emitting streetlamps 15m apart. On a foggy light, an observer standing next to the 1st light notes the radiation flux from the 2nd light is 5.0 times that of the 3rd. The last streetlamp definitely seen is the 12th.
If the air+fog density is 1.20x10^-3 g/cm^3, what are the volume and mass absorption coeff?

This is my work so far...

F2 = 5F[SIZE]3

Using the equation dIv/ds = -kvIv
I set Iv=Fv (Intensity = flux)
therefore dFv/Fv = -kvds
Integrating the left side from F2 to F3, the right hand side from 0 to s.
I got ln(F3/F2) = -ks, where F2 = 5F[SIZE]3
so k = -ln(1/5) / s, where s = 15m

here i got that k = .001073 (1/cm) for volume absorption coeff
and 0.89 cm^2/g for the mass absorption coeff...

They don't seem right, can anyone give a better direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No takers?

According to my calculations, the 2nd streetlap is about 9 million times "brighter" than the 12th. Optical depth of the 2nd lamp is around 1.7, 12th about 18.
 


Your work so far seems to be on the right track. However, there are a few things to consider in order to get more accurate results.

Firstly, the equation you are using, dIv/ds = -kvIv, is the Beer-Lambert law, which relates the intensity of light to its absorption coefficient and the distance it travels through a medium. This law assumes that the medium is homogeneous, meaning that the density and composition of the medium do not change along the path of the light. In this case, the fog density is given, but it is important to note that fog is not a homogeneous medium. It is made up of tiny water droplets that scatter and absorb light in a non-uniform manner. This can affect the accuracy of your results.

Secondly, the equation you have used assumes that the light from the streetlamps is isotropic, meaning that it is emitted in all directions equally. However, in reality, streetlamps emit light in a specific direction, which may not be isotropic. This can also affect the accuracy of your results.

To improve your results, you could try using a more accurate equation for light absorption in fog, such as the Mie scattering equation, which takes into account the non-uniform nature of fog particles. Additionally, you could try taking measurements at different distances from the streetlamps and averaging your results to account for any directional emission of light.

Overall, solving for volume and mass absorption coefficients in foggy astrophysics class can be a challenging problem due to the complex nature of fog as a medium. It is important to consider the limitations of the equations and assumptions made in order to get more accurate results.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top