Solving for x in a trinomial that has a GCF

  • Thread starter Thread starter danielle36
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the trinomial 4x² + 4x - 48 = 0, it can be factored as 4(x - 4)(x + 3) = 0. The presence of the factor 4 does not affect the solution set, which remains {4, -3}. When either x = 4 or x = -3, the entire expression equals zero, confirming these values are correct. Dividing the equation by 4 simplifies it to (x - 4)(x + 3) = 0, yielding the same solutions. Thus, the solutions for x are accurately identified as 4 and -3.
danielle36
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
What I am trying to do here is to factor so i can come up with the solutions for x (which are 4 and -3).
4x^{2} + 4x - 48 = 0

Here's what I've done to solve so far:
4(x^{2} - 1x - 12) = 0
4(x-4)(x+3)=0

Now I'm not even sure if what I'm doing is right here, but if it is my problem is comming to the solution set itself - I'm really just not sure what to do with that initial 4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have basically solved the problem. The question is, what values of x cause the expression on the left hand side to be zero (i.e. what values of x *satisfy* the equation)? If you ask yourself the question in this way, you will realize that the presence of the additional factor of 4 in front makes NO difference at all. The solution set is still {4,-3}, just as it would be if the 4 were not there. Take a look:

If x = 4, the expression becomes 4*0*7 = 0
If x = -3, it becomes 4*(-7)*0 = 0

Anything multiplied by zero is zero. Therefore, if any ONE of the three factors is zero, the entire product must be zero.
 
If it makes you feel better, you can divide out the factor four.
You know that performing the same operation on both sides of the equals sign, does not change the equation. Dividing the left hand side by four gives (x - 4)(x + 3). The right hand side gives 0/4 = 0. So the solutions to
(x - 4)(x + 3) = 0
are the same as those to
4 (x - 4)(x + 3) = 0.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top