Solving for Zener Diode Voltage

  • Thread starter Thread starter d3thkn1ght
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diode Voltage
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the output voltage (VO) and output noise (vo) in a circuit involving a Zener diode. Participants are exploring how to determine the load line and operating point for the Zener diode, which is reverse biased, and are seeking assistance with the relevant calculations and circuit analysis techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about calculating the load line for the Zener diode and requests basic steps for this calculation.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to post the circuit diagram and problem statement for clarity.
  • A participant shares their attempt at using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) but questions the accuracy of their load line intersection with the IV curve.
  • There is a discussion about the inclusion of the load resistor (RL) in the Thevenin equivalent circuit, with some participants suggesting it should be included while others clarify that the Zener diode should be removed to find the Thevenin equivalent.
  • Participants debate whether to treat the Zener diode as a resistor or to remove it entirely when calculating the Thevenin voltage and resistance.
  • Some participants propose modeling the Zener as an ideal Zener in series with a resistor, while others discuss the implications of the Zener's operating mode on the circuit analysis.
  • Questions arise about the proper method to determine the open circuit voltage and short circuit current when calculating the Thevenin equivalent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to find the Thevenin equivalent circuit but have differing views on how to treat the Zener diode in this process. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific steps to take in calculating the load line and operating point.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and roles of various components in the circuit, particularly regarding the Zener diode and load resistor. There are also unresolved questions about the correct approach to calculating the Thevenin equivalent and the implications for the load line analysis.

  • #31
For the zener model, I would guess a 5 V source and a 1 ohm resistor? With the + end of the source pointing up
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
d3thkn1ght said:
For the zener model, I would guess a 5 V source and a 1 ohm resistor? With the + end of the source pointing up
Yes. Very good.
 
  • #33
Great, I will try the equations and post my results. Thanks again for all your patience.
 
  • #34
So far, I came up with the following equation for KCL:
$$\frac{ (E - Vz)} {Rin} = Iz + \frac {Vz} {RL}$$
 
  • #35
Usually the variable name Vz is reserved for the zener threshold voltage (which is 5 V in this case). Maybe you want to name the node voltage something else. Vout perhaps? If you've replaced the zener with its equivalent model then you should just have resistors and voltage supplies to deal with. That is, you can write an expression for Iz in terms of E and Vz (given that Vz is the zener threshold voltage).
upload_2017-4-13_16-41-7.png


You can plug in the values for the fixed components Rin, RL, rz, Vz. You'll be left with Vout in terms of E.
 
  • #36
Thanks for clarifying. I was confused a little on the Vout part of it all. I'll try this.

Thanks again.
 
  • #37
Is this formula correct:
$$\frac{ (E - Vz)} {Rin} = Iz + \frac {VL} {RL}$$

If so, is Vout = VL?
 
  • #38
No, I don't see that as being correct. You haven't accounted for the zener resistance rz, and you've introduced a current variable Iz for no particular reason. An expression for Iz can be written directly using the given component values and the node voltage.

You have three voltages to work with: E, Vz, and Vout. You have three resistances to work with: Rin, RL, and rz. You shouldn't need any other variables or values.
 
  • #39
Okay, thanks for clarifying.
 
  • #40
Is this equation any better:
$$\frac{E-V_z}{R_{in}} = \frac{V_z}{rz} - \frac{V_L} {R_L}$$
 
  • #41
No. You're taking Vz as the voltage at the node, but it isn't. Vz is the zener's threshold voltage, but the zener model in use comprises the voltage source that is Vz and the series resistance. The node voltage is across those two connected in series:

upload_2017-4-15_16-19-10.png


Your node equation should involve Vout, since that's the node voltage.
 
  • #42
I was able to get the right answer using the following formula:
$$\frac{E-V_{out}}{R_{in}}=\frac{V_{out}-5}{rz} + \frac{V_{out}}{R_L}$$
 
  • #43
d3thkn1ght said:
I was able to get the right answer using the following formula:
$$\frac{E-V_{out}}{R_{in}}=\frac{V_{out}-5}{rz} + \frac{V_{out}}{R_L}$$
Yes! That's a good node equation.

After plugging in the given resistor values, what expression did you get for Vout (in terms of E)?
 
  • #44
The question wanted to know the contribution of VI which it called Vout and then the contribution from vi which was called vo.

For RL of 2K ohms:
E of 9.5 V gave a value of 5.001997004. I put in 5.1 since from my understanding the Zener diode keeps a constant voltage when open and it worked. This was before you had me work on the KCL equation.

For E of 0.05V, I got vo of .0000499251.
What I did was take the equation and get two answers, when E was 9.55 and when E was 9.45
Then I divided E(9.55)-E(9.45) by two. That was the correct answer. I don't know i I did that right but it worked. I am guessing, if I did it right, that the voltage source vi is a sine wave and sometimes has positive voltage and other times negative voltage. Thus you take the average value and that is what the vo voltage is.
 
  • #45
Okay, that works. But you could also have substituted ##E = (V_I + V_i)## and expanded the equation for ##V_{out}##, grouping it into constant DC components and an AC component involving ##V_i##. Then you'd have your DC and AC terms separated.
 
  • #46
Great to know. Thanks again for all the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K