Solving Force Combinations: 6N + 8N = 14N, 2N, 10N

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crusaderking1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves combining two forces, 6 N and 8 N, to achieve resultant forces of 14 N, 2 N, and 10 N. The context is centered on vector addition and graphical representation of forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss graphical methods for vector addition and explore different configurations for achieving the resultant forces. Questions arise about the conditions under which the resultant force magnitudes can be achieved, particularly regarding direction and angles between the forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing insights about vector addition methods and questioning assumptions about the angles between forces. Some guidance has been offered regarding the graphical representation and the concept of resolving vectors into components.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of previous lab experiences involving forces at angles, which may influence participants' understanding of the current problem. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the application of vector addition principles in different scenarios.

Crusaderking1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3. Draw figures showing how you would combine a 6 N force and an 8 N force to obtain a resultant force with magnitude (a) 14 N; (b) 2 N; (c) 10 N.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I just don't know where to start or what equation to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you understand how to calculate a vector sum graphically? That's all this question is really about...
 
cepheid said:
Do you understand how to calculate a vector sum graphically? That's all this question is really about...

In our lab we graphed forces, but they had an angle as well.
 
Oh wait, like draw a straight line with 8 and 6 for 14, while drawing lines with arrows towards each other for 2?

14
-------------->------------------------->2
--------------><-------------------------
 
Crusaderking1 said:
Oh wait, like draw a straight line with 8 and 6 for 14, while drawing lines with arrows towards each other for 2?

Well, you've found two combinations that work. If the forces are in the same direction, the magnitude of the resultant is just the sum of the magnitudes of the two vectors. Likewise if they're in the exact opposite direction, the magnitude of the resultant is just the difference of their magnitudes. But the more general case is when they are not co-linear, meaning along the same line. I.e. the angle between them is something other than 0 or 180 degrees. How do you find the resultant in this case? In other words, how do vectors sum together? You should know this.
 
cepheid said:
Well, you've found two combinations that work. If the forces are in the same direction, the magnitude of the resultant is just the sum of the magnitudes of the two vectors. Likewise if they're in the exact opposite direction, the magnitude of the resultant is just the difference of their magnitudes. But the more general case is when they are not co-linear, meaning along the same line. I.e. the angle between them is something other than 0 or 180 degrees. How do you find the resultant in this case? In other words, how do vectors sum together? You should know this.

Well, I can add vectors(of force) by finding components, graphing them, or using a force table.

I don't really know how to add vectors that well, but wouldn't there be a 90 degree angle between 6 and 8 to give me 10, since 8^2+6^2 square root= 10.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Crusaderking1 said:
Well, I can add vectors(of force) by finding components, graphing them, or using a force table.

I don't really know how to add vectors that well, but wouldn't there be a 90 degree angle between 6 and 8 to give me 10, since 8^2+6^2 square root= 10.

Yeah. So you figured out the answer to all three cases by trial and error or "guess and check." But the general method for finding the resultant is either to resolve each vector into components and add them component-wise, or to do it graphically by using the "parallelogram rule" for vector sums (which I can only assume you must have learned):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector#Addition_and_subtraction
 
cepheid said:
Yeah. So you figured out the answer to all three cases by trial and error or "guess and check." But the general method for finding the resultant is either to resolve each vector into components and add them component-wise, or to do it graphically by using the "parallelogram rule" for vector sums (which I can only assume you must have learned):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector#Addition_and_subtraction

Thanks a lot.

I definitely understand what I'm suppose to do much better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K