Solving groundbreaking physics problems as a career?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and considerations of pursuing a career focused on solving difficult and unsolved problems in physics and mathematics. It touches on issues of funding, support, and the practical realities faced by scientists and researchers in this field.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that cutting out intermediaries in funding could lead to more efficient problem-solving in physics and mathematics.
  • Others argue that the unsolved problems are inherently difficult and that simply advocating for their resolution does not contribute to actual progress.
  • There are practical challenges related to support and funding, with some noting that many researchers need day jobs to sustain their work on complex problems.
  • Access to necessary infrastructure, such as research libraries and computational resources, is highlighted as a significant barrier for independent researchers.
  • A participant humorously suggests that extraordinary inventions could provide financial freedom to focus on research without the usual constraints.
  • It is noted that many scientists are reasonably funded but still struggle to solve difficult problems, indicating the complexity of the issues at hand.
  • Some problems lack immediate commercial interest, making it difficult to secure funding unless one is in a position of academic tenure or can propose lucrative applications for solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the best approach to tackling unsolved problems in physics and mathematics. There are competing perspectives on the feasibility of independent research and the role of funding and support in scientific progress.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexities of funding and support systems in science, as well as the inherent difficulties of the problems being discussed. The discussion reflects a variety of assumptions about the nature of research and the conditions necessary for success.

PairofDimes
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Seems like it might be easier to just cut out the middlemen who hold the dollars and do a bunch of math somewhere until there are a few less "unsolved problems in mathematics" on wikipedia. What's stopping scientists from doing this? Much more efficient in terms of physicist-life-hours.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These problems are unsolved for a reason... They're very difficult. Suggesting, 'let's stop kidding around and solve them already' isn't really going to move forward the effort much.
 
Some people do.

The practical issue though, is one of support. If you don't have anyone supporting you in the work that you do, you have to figure out a means of doing that yourself. For those without independently wealthy parents this usually means getting a day job.

Then the problem becomes one of time. To really make progress on the difficult problems you need a lot of dedicated time and for most people life gets in the way.

There are ways around the dilemma. Some people actually do produce quality work as "amatuers."
 
PairofDimes said:
Seems like it might be easier to just cut out the middlemen who hold the dollars and do a bunch of math somewhere until there are a few less "unsolved problems in mathematics" on wikipedia. What's stopping scientists from doing this?

The need to eat.

The other issue is that there is a lot of "infrastructure" that you need in order to do science, and you don't realize that the infrastructure exists until you don't have it. For example, having a well stocked research library turns out to be rather difficult. Also, having access to computers and internet is also non-trivial.

Much more efficient in terms of physicist-life-hours.

It's in fact not.

For example, suppose that you need to buy tickets to get to a conference and then track the money that you used to buy the tickets to get to the conference. If you work at a university, there are people who do this for you, so that you can spend time thinking about things other than how to work the bureaucracy.

If you get rid of "middlemen" you will in fact be overwhelmed with administrivia.
 
Unless you can build an ultra-sonic death-ray. Then you can chill in your lair thinking about stuff, enjoying the money the people of the world give you for not using your ultra-sonic death-ray.
 
What Nabeshin said.

There are lots of reasonably funded scientists out there working on difficult problems. Most won't simply "solve" them.
 
Also keep in mind that not all problems are of immediate commercial interest, ergo it is pretty hard to get funding to work on them unless you:

a. are a tenured professor
b. can think up some multi-million euro application if it's solved. It's a sad world we live in :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K