Solving [H,x] Operator Algebra

  • Thread starter Thread starter FarticleFysics
  • Start date Start date
FarticleFysics
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to practice some operator algebra..

Solve [H,x] where H is the Hamiltonian operator, x is position operator, and assuming one dimensional potential energy, U(x).

I know the commutator comes out as -ih_bar(p_op)/m


Here is my work so far.

[H,x] = Hx - xH

note: H = [ -ih_bar(p/2m) + U(x) ]

so.. plug it in.. [ -ih_bar(p/2m) + U(x) ] x - x [ -ih_bar(p/2m) + U(x) ]

( x U(x) and -x U(x) cancel)

now.. -(ih_bar/2m)(p x) + (ih_bar/2m)(x p)

-(ih_bar/2m)[ p x - x p ]

x and p are both operators.. so I know they don't cancel.. I'm kind of lost at this point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, px - xp is just another way of writing [p,x], which by definition is i\hbar. However, this doesn't give you the answer you're looking for, because your Hamiltonian isn't right. The standard nonrelativistic Hamiltonian is \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + U(\hat{x}), which should give you the commutation relations you're looking for.
 
Oh yeah.. haha thanks.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top