Solving Homework Equations: Your Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter rado5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a mass m on a string of length l and tension T, rotating at an angle α with angular velocity ω. Participants clarify the calculation of torque (τ) and angular momentum (L), emphasizing that τ should be calculated as τ = r x -mgz, not r x F. The correct relationship between torque and angular momentum is established as τ = dL/dt, leading to the conclusion that τ = mglsinα for the given scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and torque calculations
  • Familiarity with angular momentum concepts
  • Knowledge of vector operations in physics
  • Basic grasp of forces acting on rotating systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of torque in rotating systems using τ = r x F
  • Learn about the relationship between torque and angular momentum, specifically τ = dL/dt
  • Explore examples of rotational motion problems involving multiple forces
  • Review the principles of angular velocity and its impact on torque calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, educators teaching rotational dynamics, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of torque and angular momentum in rotational systems.

rado5
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=29303&stc=1&d=1287747838.jpg


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Torque of force.jpg
    Torque of force.jpg
    35 KB · Views: 503
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rado5! :smile:

(have an alpha: α and an omega: ω and a tau: τ :wink:)

to clarify: is this a mass m on a string of length l and tension T rotating at angle α with angular velocity ω?

or is there also a horizontal cable with tension F? :confused:

assuming the former, you've calculated τ (about the vertical axis) using the wrong force …

τ is r x -mgz, not r x F

(T and F don't count because they go through the vertical axis; F also doesn't count if there's no horizontal cable, because then you just invented F) :wink:
 
Hi tiny-tim!

Thank you very much for your kind help.

Yes, this is a mass m on a string of length l and tension T rotating at angle α with angular velocity ω.

attachment.php?attachmentid=29312&stc=1&d=1287755883.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Torque of force 2.jpg
    Torque of force 2.jpg
    33.1 KB · Views: 486
hi rado5! :smile:

i'm getting confused … it would be easier if you typed your answer, instead of giving us a photo of your handwriting

you're trying to do τ = r x Fnet = dL/dt

but about the vertical axis, L is constant, and τ is zero

we solve this sort of problem with the ordinary linear F = ma equation​
 
Hi tiny-tim!

tiny-tim said:
you're trying to do τ = r x Fnet = dL/dt

but about the vertical axis, L is constant, and τ is zero

we solve this sort of problem with the ordinary linear F = ma equation​

There are two problems in my book. The first one is an example with its solution. As I told you before the solution is \vec{\tau}=mglsin\alpha \vec{e_{\theta}} for the problem \vec{\tau}= \vec{r} \times \vec{F}. The second one is a problem with no solution which asks "Is \vec{\tau}= \frac{d\vec{L}}{dt} correct for \vec{\tau}= \vec{r} \times \vec{F} in the first example". I have been trying to show that it must be correct. I mean I have to show that \vec{\tau}= \vec{r} \times \vec{F} = \frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}.
 
oh i see now!

the confusion is that you're not treating τ and L as vectors

your τ is calculated about the top of the string, and is r x -mgz,

with (as you say) magnitude mglsinα, and direction tangential

your L (calculated about the top of the string) is r x v, which is sticking up diagonally outward

L's vertical component is constant, so you need only bother with d/dt of its horizontal component …

that should give you the required τ = dL/dt :smile:
 
Hi tiny-tim!

Thank you very much for your kind help.

I think my book solved the first example in a bad way!

I was very naive about \vec{L}, because I wrote \vec{L} = mlr \omega \vec{e_{r}} which is wrong! Because \vec{r} = lsin \alpha \vec{e_{r}} - lcos \alpha \vec{k} and \vec{v} = r \omega \vec{e_{\theta}} so \vec{L} = \vec{r} \times mv = mlr \omega cos \alpha \vec{e_{r}} + mlr \omega sin \alpha \vec{k}.

Now we have \vec{\tau}= \frac{d \vec{L}}{dt} = mlr \omega ^{2} cos \alpha \vec{e_{\theta}} = lFcos \alpha \vec{e_{\theta}}.

\vec{\tau} = lmgtan \alpha cos \alpha \vec{e_{\theta}}

\vec{\tau} = mglsin \alpha \vec{e_{\theta}} which is the right answer!
 
you got it! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
802
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K