MHB Solving Ideals in Q[x,y]: Cox et al Chapter 1 Section 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Chapter 1, Section 4, Cox et al "Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms"

Exercise 3(a) reads as follows:

In $$ \mathbb{Q}[x,y] $$ show the following equality of ideals:

<x + y, x - y > = <x, y>

I would appreciate help with this problem.

====================================================

My 'solution' (of which I am most unsure!) is as follows:

Idea generated by x + y, x - y is the ideal

$$ h_1 ( x + y) + h_2 (x - y)$$ where $$ h_1, h_2 \in \mathbb{Q}[x,y] $$

Ideal generated by x, y is the ideal

$$ h_3 x + h_4 y $$ where $$ h_3, h_4 \in \mathbb{Q}[x,y] $$

So

$$ h_1(x + y) + h_2 (x - y) = h_1x + h_1y + h_2x - h_2y $$

$$ = (h_1 + h_2)x + (h_1 - h_2)y $$

$$ = h_3x + h_4y $$

$$ <x,y> $$

Can someone please either correct this reasoning or confirm that is is correct/adequate.

Peter

[This is also posted on MHF]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation $$\begin{aligned} h_1(x + y) + h_2 (x - y) &= h_1x + h_1y + h_2x - h_2y \\ &= (h_1 + h_2)x + (h_1 - h_2)y \\ &= h_3x + h_4y \end{aligned}$$ shows that every element $h_1(x + y) + h_2 (x - y)$ in the ideal $\langle x+y,x-y\rangle$ generated by $x+y$ and $x-y$ can be expressed in the form $h_3x + h_4y$, where $h_3 = h_1+h_2$ and $h_4 = h_1-h_2$. This shows that $\langle x+y,x-y\rangle \subseteq \langle x,y\rangle.$

So far, so good. To show the reverse inclusion, you must start with an element $h_3x + h_4y \in \langle x,y\rangle$ and express it in the form $h_1(x + y) + h_2 (x - y)$. Your equation shows that this can be done by taking $h_1 = \frac12(h_3+h_4)$ and $h_2 = \frac12(h_3-h_4)$. What you omitted from your solution was to point out that this works, because the fraction $\frac12$ is in $\mathbb{Q}$.

Notice that if the question had asked you to show the same result in $\mathbb{Z}[x,y]$ then it would no longer have been correct, because the fraction $\frac12$ is not available in $\mathbb{Z}.$
 
Opalg said:
Your equation $$\begin{aligned} h_1(x + y) + h_2 (x - y) &= h_1x + h_1y + h_2x - h_2y \\ &= (h_1 + h_2)x + (h_1 - h_2)y \\ &= h_3x + h_4y \end{aligned}$$ shows that every element $h_1(x + y) + h_2 (x - y)$ in the ideal $\langle x+y,x-y\rangle$ generated by $x+y$ and $x-y$ can be expressed in the form $h_3x + h_4y$, where $h_3 = h_1+h_2$ and $h_4 = h_1-h_2$. This shows that $\langle x+y,x-y\rangle \subseteq \langle x,y\rangle.$

So far, so good. To show the reverse inclusion, you must start with an element $h_3x + h_4y \in \langle x,y\rangle$ and express it in the form $h_1(x + y) + h_2 (x - y)$. Your equation shows that this can be done by taking $h_1 = \frac12(h_3+h_4)$ and $h_2 = \frac12(h_3-h_4)$. What you omitted from your solution was to point out that this works, because the fraction $\frac12$ is in $\mathbb{Q}$.

Notice that if the question had asked you to show the same result in $\mathbb{Z}[x,y]$ then it would no longer have been correct, because the fraction $\frac12$ is not available in$\mathbb{Z}.$
Thanks OpalgReally appreciate your help
Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K