Solving Integral Equation: \int_0^2 t y(t)dt = 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter sara_87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the integral equation \(\int_0^2 t y(t)dt = 3\), which involves understanding the nature of integral equations and the functions that can satisfy such an equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of differentiating the integral equation and question the validity of that approach. There is discussion about the lack of constraints to uniquely determine the function \(y(t)\) and the possibility of multiple solutions.

Discussion Status

The conversation has highlighted that there are infinitely many functions that could satisfy the integral equation, with some participants suggesting specific forms of solutions. There is acknowledgment of the ambiguity in the problem statement and the need for further clarification on constraints.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks sufficient constraints to specify a unique solution for \(y(t)\), leading to a discussion about the generality of potential solutions.

sara_87
Messages
748
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



solve the integral equation:

[tex]\int_0^2 t y(t)dt = 3[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If we differentiate we get:
0 = xy(x)
which means y=0.
but this is the wrong answer and i think this is the wrong approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your proposed calculation is not correct (as you know of course), because both sides of the integral equation are simply constant numbers, i.e. they don't depend on any variable with respect to which you can differentiate.

It would have been correct if the upper integration limit had been t, but here it is simply 2.

So you must think a bit differently on this one.

Torquil
 
i can't think of a different method
:(
 
Something about that problem statement appears to be suspicious... Solving an integral equation would normally mean solving for the general form of y(x), and applying boundary conditions to get it into the exact form you want. Here, there aren't enough constraints to uniquely specify y; in fact, there aren't even enough constraints to specify the FORM of y! You could write y = C, y = Ct, y = Csin(t), y = Ce^t, etc, and then solve for C in each of those by doing the integral to get different expressions for y. In short, this problem makes no sense.
 
Ok, but it's not really "a method".

Hint: There is an infinite number of different functions y(t) that will be able to solve the equation. In fact, almost any integrable function will be able to do it, if it is correctly normalized.

The problem only says to "solve it", so any solution will do.

Torquil
 
oh right, i see.
like y=3/2 can be a solution for an example.

so there's infinitely many solutions.
 
Almost...

EDIT: Yes! :-)
 
thanks
:)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K