Solving J.E = W/V with Dimensional Analysis

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AriAstronomer
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation J.E = W/V, specifically examining its dimensional consistency through dimensional analysis. Participants explore the interpretation of the terms involved, particularly focusing on the relationship between current density, electric field, and power per unit volume.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Ari expresses confusion over the dimensional analysis of the equation, noting an extra unit of seconds in the denominator when calculating J.E.
  • Another participant confirms the same dimensional analysis, suggesting that J.E can be expressed in terms of voltage and length, but questions the source of the claim Ari references.
  • A third participant corrects Ari, stating that W should be interpreted as power (work per time), which has dimensions of J/s.
  • One participant clarifies that J.E represents power per unit volume, linking it to concepts like the Poynting vector and energy density in fields.
  • Ari acknowledges the clarification, attributing the confusion to a potential typo on a flashcard used for GRE preparation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that J.E represents power per unit volume, but there is some disagreement regarding the interpretation of W in the original equation and the source of the claim Ari encountered.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of terms like work and power, as well as the context in which the original claim was presented. The discussion does not resolve the dimensional analysis issue raised by Ari.

AriAstronomer
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,
So I know I'm missing something really stupid, but I can't figure out what it is.
I'm seeing the claim that the current density dotted with the Electric field is equal to Work per volume, or: J.E = W/V. Using dimensional analysis though, I keep getting an extra unit of seconds on the left hand side of the denominator:
(Cm/m^3s)(N/C) = J/(m^3)
Nm/sm^3 = J/m^3
J/sm^3 = J/m^3

What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Ari
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get the same answer as you using the fact that the electric field has dimensions of voltage / length. Then J*E becomes

[C/(sm2)] * V/m

= (C*J/C)*m-3s-1

= Jm-3s-1

Where exactly are you "seeing this claim?"
 
W isn't "work" ,it's work/t(its dimension is J/s),you mistakes at this
 
Yeah J dot E is power per unit volume. That's usually the starting point for deriving expressions for the poynting vector and the energy density in the field.
 
Ahh Power/Volume. Thanks. I had seen this claim on a flashcard, I'm preparing for GRE's and got a bunch of flash cards sent from a school to help me. Must be a typo on their part then.

Ari
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K