Solving Kinematics Problems: Distance Traveled Before Applying Brakes

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the distance traveled before applying brakes, the average alcohol-free driver takes about 0.8 seconds at a speed of 17 m/s. The initial approach using the formula d = vt yields a distance of 14 meters, which the user doubts. However, the consensus is that this calculation is correct since it doesn't require acceleration, as the question pertains to the time before braking. The discussion emphasizes keeping the solution simple and not overcomplicating the problem. Overall, the method used to find the distance is validated by other participants in the thread.
nblu
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Q: The average alcohol-free driver requires about 0.8 s to apply the brakes
after seeing an emergency. Calculate the distance traveled after seeing the emergency
before applying the brakes.

with the question, the given speed is 17 m/s and t = 0.8.
at first, i used d =vt equation to find the distance, however,
when i read through the question again, i had a feeling that it's not right.
my first answer was d=14m, but it just doesn't look correct.

i was thinking of finding the acceleration then use v^{2}_{f}=v^{2}_{i} +2a\Deltad
to solve for d, OR, use this equation, \Deltad=1/2(v_{1}+v_{2})\Deltat, without
even having to find the acceleration.

one part of my knowledge tells me that i don't need acceleration to do this question
because this is about "before" applying the break.

its confusing me..

any help would be greatly appreciated.

thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You "know" what you did is right. Resist the temptation to complicate it. I'm sure you'll get a chance to use that other stuff later.
 
nblu said:
with the question, the given speed is 17 m/s and t = 0.8.
at first, i used d =vt equation to find the distance, however,
when i read through the question again, i had a feeling that it's not right.
my first answer was d=14m, but it just doesn't look correct.


one part of my knowledge tells me that i don't need acceleration to do this question
because this is about "before" applying the break.

If Dick's reply isn't enough, your logic is right to me, simple enough. I don't see how it doesn't "look correct".
 
Dick said:
You "know" what you did is right. Resist the temptation to complicate it. I'm sure you'll get a chance to use that other stuff later.

Siracuse said:
If Dick's reply isn't enough, your logic is right to me, simple enough. I don't see how it doesn't "look correct".

Thank you, I really appreciate it! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top