Solving Kinematics w/ Negative Acceleration: Meaning of Negative Root?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about solving kinematics with negative acceleration, a particle moving along the x-axis starts at -5 with constant negative acceleration. The kinematics equation Δx = v_0t + 1/2 at^2 yields two roots, one of which is negative. The negative root indicates a time when the particle was previously at the origin, while the positive root represents when it will reach the origin next. A participant points out a potential error in the problem's signs, suggesting that both roots should be positive if the particle starts with a positive velocity. The conversation concludes with an affirmation of the interpretation of the negative root in the context of the particle's motion.
oneplusone
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
Suppose a particle is moving along the $x$ axis with velocity $v$. It starts at the point $-5$ and has constant negative acceleration $a$.
You need to find what time the particle reaches the origin.

My teacher solved this question, and used the kinematics equation Δx = v_0t+1/2 at^2

The quadratic had two roots, one of which was negative. What does the negative root mean? Is it extraneous (my teacher just said to ignore it)?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The givens of the problem can be seen as specifying the position of the particle not only at all future times, but at all past times as well. The negative solution is the time when the particle was previously at the origin. The positive solution is when the particle will next be at the origin.
 
Last edited:
So does this mean that the particle crosses the origin, and later the negative acceleration causes the particle to eventually go backwards, back to the origin?
 
oneplusone said:
So does this mean that the particle crosses the origin, and later the negative acceleration causes the particle to eventually go backwards, back to the origin?

Something is wrong with your signs in the original statement of your problem. If the particle started at -5 (left of the origin) with a positive velocity (right-moving) and a negative acceleration (being pulled to the left) both roots should have been positive, corresponding to exactly what you're describing here.

JBriggs's answer as to the meaning of a negative root in these problems is correct.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top