Solving Linear Dielectric Eqns for E & P

AI Thread Summary
In solving linear dielectric equations, the relationship between electric susceptibility (χe), free charge density (ρ), and the resulting electric field (E) is crucial. The equation D = εE, where ε = ε0(1+χe), helps derive the electric field from the free charges. The polarization induced by free charges further influences the electric field, leading to the equation E = ε0χeP. Despite the complexity of the interactions, the calculations of E and polarization (P) can be achieved with limited initial information. This approach effectively accounts for the reduced electric field in materials with varying dielectric constants.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Say we have a linear dielectric with electric susceptibility χe a certain free charge density ρ. By using the fact that ∫D\cdotda = Qfree-enclosed you can find the resulting electric field, because D = εE , where ε = ε0(1+χe).

The above is very weird for me. It seems to me that you are getting out too much information compared to how much you have at the start.

Let's look at it.

We know that the free charges will induce a certain polarization. These will in turn induce and electric field which induces a polarization and so on. This is not easy to break up to infinity but we find for linear dielectrics that the total electric field due to polarization such that:

E = ε0χeP

But how do we have any information that allows us to compute either the total field in the end or the total polarization? All we know is the field due to the free charges and the constant of proportionality between the total resulting field and P. It just seems magical to me that you are actually able to calculate E or P with just this information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\vec{P}=\epsilon_{0}\chi_{e}\vec{E}
\vec{D}=\epsilon_{0}\vec{E}+\vec{P}=\epsilon_{0} \chi_{e}\vec{E}+\epsilon_{0} \vec{E}=\epsilon \vec{E}=\epsilon_{r} \epsilon_{0}\vec{E}

Basically, this is simply a way to account for the apparent reduced E field in a material of different dielectric constant. At least that's how I think of it.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top