Solving Linear First Order PDE with Initial Conditions

MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71

Homework Statement



Mod note: Pasted the OP's correction into the original problem.[/color]
Solve
xe^z\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} - 2ye^z\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \left(2y-x \right)\frac{\partial u}{\partial z} = 0
given that for x > 0, u = -x^{-3}e^z when y=-x

Homework Equations


\mathbf{a}\left(\mathbf{x} \right) \cdot \nabla u = 0
means that on a curve parameterized by t where
\frac{\partial \mathbf{x}}{\partial t} = \mathbf{a}\left(\mathbf{x} \right)
\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \nabla u \cdot \frac{\partial \mathbf{x}}{\partial t} = \mathbf{a}\left(\mathbf{x} \right) \cdot \nabla u = 0
In other words solutions to \frac{\partial \mathbf{x}}{\partial t} = \mathbf{a}\left(\mathbf{x} \right), called characteristics, are the level curves of u

The Attempt at a Solution


So the characteristic system is
\dot{x} = xe^z

\dot{y} = -2ye^z

\dot{z} = 2y-x

First we can notice
e^z = \frac{\dot{x}}{x} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{\dot{y}}{y}
By substitution we can arrive at
\int \frac{dx}{x} = -\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{dy}{y}
ln(x) = -\frac{1}{2}ln(y) + C
x = C_1y^{-1/2}
Now we may also notice that \dot{z} looks at lot like the sum of the coefficients of e^z in \dot{x} and \dot{y}.
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left(x + y \right) = -\frac{\partial z}{\partial t}e^z = - \frac{\partial e^z}{\partial t}
thus
e^z = x + y + C_2 = C_1y^{-1/2} + y + C_2
z = ln\left( C_1y^{-1/2} + y + C_2\right)
I think it means I have solved the characteristic.
y = t
x = \frac{C_1}{\sqrt{t}}
z = ln\left( C_1t^{-1/2} + t + C_2\right)

However I am not sure what to do now to utilize the initial conditions and come up with the solution of the PDE. I know that the value of u at a point will be equal to the value of the initial conditions at the intersection of the initial conditions with the characteristic that goes through that point. I think we were taught about characteristics not being parallel to the initial conditions curve, but I'm not firm on exactly what the existence conditions were. Any help would be appreciated. If anyone has a suggestion for a book that covers this that might be easier or more helpful than Evans, I'd be interested.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You went to a lot of effort to format this using LaTeX, but right off the bat, your first equation is incomprehensible.

With respect to which variables are your three partials taken?
MisterX said:

Homework Statement


Solve
xe^z\frac{\partial u}{\partial} - 2ye^z\frac{\partial u}{\partial} + \left(2y-x \right)\frac{\partial u}{\partial} = 0
 
Oops, here you go.

Homework Statement


Solve
xe^z\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} - 2ye^z\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \left(2y-x \right)\frac{\partial u}{\partial z} = 0
given that for x > 0, u = -x^{-3}e^z when y=-x
 
I would set t = x, to avoid the square root.
At what value of t does a level curve intersect y = -x? What is the value of u there?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top