Solving Logarithmic Equation: Log81x + logx3 = 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter valon92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
10 replies · 2K views
valon92
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The equation is the following:
Log81x + logx3 = 2

I've been bashing my head with change of base but i can't seem to get anywhere with it. 81 is rewritable as 34 which seems like it has something to do with the solution, but i just can't seem to get the hang of it. I always get stuck with logs on both sides of the equation and no way to simplify it further..
Any help?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the change of base formula is as follows: [tex]log_ab=\frac{log_cb}{log_ca}[/tex] so really you don't even need to use the fact that 81=34, but you can. Use the change of base first and then see where you get.
 
yup using the change of base i got to: ln x/ln 81 + ln3/lnx = 2 but that's as far as i got. I tried simplifying them, getting a common denominator, bringing onto the other side but seems nothing that i do gets me to a solution
 
Do you mean after the change of base or through the original?
 
After the change of base, you'll have a quadratic in u to solve.

And by the way, since [tex]log_ab=c[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]a^c=b[/tex] then [tex]log_{a^n}b=c[/tex] is equivalent to [tex](a^n)^c=b[/tex] or [tex]a^{nc}=b[/tex] so you can change it into [tex]log_ab=nc[/tex]. You can use this for [tex]81=3^4[/tex]
 
Mentallic said:
After the change of base, you'll have a quadratic in u to solve.

And by the way, since [tex]log_ab=c[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]a^c=b[/tex] then [tex]log_{a^n}b=c[/tex] is equivalent to [tex](a^n)^c=b[/tex] or [tex]a^{nc}=b[/tex] so you can change it into [tex]log_ab=nc[/tex]. You can use this for [tex]81=3^4[/tex]

solved it using the quadratic equation and replacing ln x with U after the change of base, thanks for the help!
 
No problem :smile: And I'd suggest you try learn to solve them without using the change of variable, because this helps you notice when you have a quadratic in some function u=f(x). It will definitely come in handy.
 
Any suggestions about expanding
(1+ax)^3/2
for 5 non-zero terms?
using pascal's triangle I am gettin horrible exponents while if i rewrite it as (Root of [1+ax])^3 it doesn't look much better as i don't have two clear values to use in the formula :\
 
uhm, might have solved it: does this look correct?
1+3/2 ax + 3/8 a^2x^2 - 1/16 a^3x^3 + 1/128 a^4x^4
 
Last edited: