Solving Lorentz Transformations for Light Speed c

  • Thread starter Thread starter RK1992
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Frames
RK1992
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Sorry, this is a really basic question which will possibly annoy you and I'm embarrassed to even be asking this :blushing:

But if you travel at say 0.5c to the left (relative to your axes) and a photon of light goes past you to the right at c (again relative to your axes) what are the sums that you do to measure its speed and get c?

Obviously the old way of approaching it is to say "Oh, its 0.5c - c = -0.5c relative to my motion" but we know that it's not.

So how do we actually apply the lorentz transformation to get the result c? I can't find anything going over this so basically :redface:

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top