Solving Math Blog Problem - Gaussianos.com

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anymodal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blog
Anymodal
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi, I came upon this problem in an old paper in my desk. I remember that I read it on the internet (I'm almost sure from the math blog gaussianos.com) and couldn't solve it. I study engineering.
The problem is to find an ƒ(t) such that:

ƒ[(x^2) + x*y + ƒ(y)] = [ƒ(x)]^2 + x*ƒ(y) + y

I'm not sure if it asked to find a general function that meets this condition or just a particular solution.
Anyone knows how to get their hands around it?
Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Anymodal said:
Hi, I came upon this problem in an old paper in my desk. I remember that I read it on the internet (I'm almost sure from the math blog gaussianos.com) and couldn't solve it. I study engineering.
The problem is to find an ƒ(t) such that:

ƒ[(x^2) + x*y + ƒ(y)] = [ƒ(x)]^2 + x*ƒ(y) + y

I'm not sure if it asked to find a general function that meets this condition or just a particular solution.
Anyone knows how to get their hands around it?
Thanks!

You could always try a few functions, starting with the simplest you can think of.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You're right. f (t)=t is the simplest solution... how could have I not seen it... anyway I am still curious about how to approach this problem to solve it analytically to find the more general and widest solution possible.

Thank you very much!
 
  • Like
Likes Mentallic
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
935
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top