Solving Math Induction: Prove 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 ... + n^3 = ((n^2 + n)/2)^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter ruud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proof of the mathematical induction statement that claims the sum of cubes from 1 to n equals ((n^2 + n)/2)^3. Initial attempts to prove the statement for n = 1 and n = 2 were made, but upon testing n = 2, it was discovered that the statement is false. Calculations showed discrepancies, indicating that the left-hand side does not equal the right-hand side for n = 2. The thread concludes with a reminder that the sequence of sums does not represent cubes, highlighting the importance of verifying mathematical statements before attempting proofs.
ruud
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck and not sure what I've done wrong for this problem

Prove the following by mathematical induction:
1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 ... + n^3 = ((n^2 + n)/2)^3

ok so I proved it for n = 1 and n = 2 then assume n = k
so ((k^2 + k)/2)^3

Then let's try to do n = k +1
so
((k+1)^2 + k +1)/2)^3 = ((k^2 + k)/2)^3 + (k + 1)^3
after expanding I get

(k^6+ 9k^5+ 33k^4+ 63k^3+ 66k^2+ 36k+ 8)/8
=
(k^6 +3k^5 + 3k^4 + 9k^3 + 24k^2 + 24k + 8)/8 + k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k +1

For some reason I think that I don't have to do all of this expanding. Can someone please tell me what I"m doing wrong or what I need to fix?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nevermind I just heard from a fellow friend that this statement is false.
 
Someone had to tell you that? Did you even try calculating a few numbers?

If n= 2, 12+ 22= 1+ 8= 9

\(\frac{n^2+n}{2}\)^3= \(\frac{4+2}{2}\)^3= 3^3= 27

so for the very second number its not true.

If you had done even the slightest amount of work on this you would have seen:
1 13 = 1
2 13+23= 1+ 8= 9
3 13+23+33= 1+ 8+ 27= 36
4 13+23+33+43= 100.

Hmmm: 1, 9, 36, 100,... what does that make you think of? Not cubes certainly!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top