MHB Solving Mechanics Problem: Friction, 2 Boys, Toy Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving two boys pulling a toy with different forces and angles on a rough surface. The toy has a mass of 3kg and a coefficient of friction of 0.3. Calculations show that the acceleration of the toy is 0.178 m/s², with the direction of acceleration favoring the younger boy's pull. The friction force acts opposite to the direction of motion, confirming that the younger boy's force overcomes the older boy's pull. The conclusion is that the toy moves in the direction of the younger boy’s pull.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
Two boys are arguing over who gets to play with a toy. The toy has mass 3kg and is at rest on rough horizontal ground with coefficient of friction 0.3. The older boy pulls with a force of 26N at an angle of 39 degree above the horizontal. The younger boy pulls in the opposite direction with a force of 24N at an angle of 9 degree above the horizontal. Determine whether the toy moves. If it accelerates find the size of the acceleration and direction.

Iam able to solve this.
I got a= 0.178m/s^2. What iam not able to reason is the direction of acceleration. Pls help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
in this case, friction acts opposite to the direction of motion … who wins?
 
skeeter said:
in this case, friction acts opposite to the direction of motion …
You mean the acceleration is positive so the friction acts in the opposite direction which is the young boy?
 
acceleration is in the direction of the young boy’s pull …

$24\cos(9) > 26\cos(39) + 0.3[3g - 24\sin(9) - 26\sin(39)]$
 
skeeter said:
acceleration is in the direction of the young boy’s pull …

$24\cos(9) > 26\cos(39) + 0.3[3g - 24\sin(9) - 26\sin(39)]$
Thank you so much!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top