Solving Pendulum Equation of Motion in Cylindrical Co-ords

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 2slowtogofast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equation of motion for a pendulum using cylindrical coordinates. Participants explore the transformation of force components from Cartesian to cylindrical coordinates, particularly focusing on the gravitational force acting on the pendulum.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how the gravitational force, which has only a y-component in Cartesian coordinates, translates to the expression Fg = mg(cos(θ)er - sin(θ)eθ) in cylindrical coordinates.
  • Another participant notes that changing the coordinate system alters the components of any vector, suggesting that the confusion may stem from a misunderstanding of vector representation in different systems.
  • A participant emphasizes the need to consider radial and tangential components when analyzing the pendulum's motion.
  • One reply suggests that the gravitational force can be decomposed into components acting along the string and tangential to the swing, referencing the parallelogram law of forces.
  • Another participant reiterates the need to find the components of the gravitational force along the direction of the string and perpendicular to it, indicating that mg cos(θ) corresponds to the radial component and mg sin(θ) to the tangential component.
  • A participant questions if their previous statement regarding the components was understood correctly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the derivation process, and multiple viewpoints regarding the transformation of force components remain. The discussion reflects ongoing confusion and clarification attempts without a definitive resolution.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about coordinate systems and the specific steps required to transition from Cartesian to cylindrical coordinates. Some participants mention the potential complexity of using three-dimensional cylindrical coordinates for a two-dimensional pendulum problem.

2slowtogofast
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
I am a bit hung up on this fact. Say you have a pendulum and you want to derive its equation of motion. In doing this you will have to look at the force from the weight on the end of the string. If you are using cylindrical co-ords this is what you get for Fg (sorry I don't have the diagram)

Fg = mg(cos(θ)er-sin(θ)eθ)

Where er and eθ are unit vectors r points along the direction of the string

If you were in x and y the weight has only a component in y so I am confused about when you transfer to cylindrical co-ord you get this. Can someone explain. If you do not understand what I am trying to convey I will draw a diagram when I get home today
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what is your confusion about. Changing the coordinate system will change the component of any vector, in general. Even remaining in Cartesian coordinates, the components will change if you choose the direction of the axes differently.
 
What I want know is how to show that if I have a force in the catersian system that has only a y component. Then how is it equal to

Fg = mg(cos(θ)er-sin(θ)eθ)

In cylindrical co ords. What are the imtermediate steps? to get from one to the other?
 
These are radial and tangential components.
For any point on the trajectory you consider the components along these two directions (radius and tangent).
 
I attached a drawing here is what I want to know If we looked at this system in x and y W is just in y. Can someone please explain how this equation is derived.

Fg = mg(cos(θ)er-sin(θ)eθ)
 

Attachments

Forget about the coordinate system (see footnote).

The gravitational force acts vertically. Some of that force stretches the string, some of it accelerates the weight towards the bottom position.

If you think about it, the force accelerating the weight acts tangentially to the swing: this is therefore at right angles to the force stretching the string which acts along it. To work out the components you draw a diagram like the one on this page.

You are almost there with your diagram, the vector labelled W needs to form the diagonal of a rectangle with sides formed by the vectors labelled er and etheta: this is the parallelogram law of forces.

Footnote:
Cylindrical coordinates are a 3-dimensional system which is not very helpful when considering a pendulum: the easiest 3-D system to use is the speherical system. But if we ignore the rotation of the earth, there are no forces acting outside the plane of swing so it looks like we only need a 2-D system: the 2-D equivalent of spherical coordinates is polar coordinates, and this is also the 2-D equivalent of the cylindrical system. But if we ignore streching of the string, the movement of the weight is also constrained in r, so in fact we only need to consider a single dimension, θ. There is only one 1-D coordinate system which is the linear system.
 
2slowtogofast said:
I attached a drawing here is what I want to know If we looked at this system in x and y W is just in y. Can someone please explain how this equation is derived.

Fg = mg(cos(θ)er-sin(θ)eθ)

Find the component of W (or mg) along the direction of the string. This is mg cos(θ) and it is the component along the er.
Find the component along the direction perpendicular to the string (tangential). This is mg sin(θ) and the component along the eθ.
Do you know how to find the components of a vector along a given direction?
 
Isn't that what I said?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K