MHB Solving Percentages in Mix Design for Asphalt Plants | Help with Math Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter dspicher
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a math problem related to the mix design for an asphalt plant, specifically how to adjust percentages of recycled materials to total 100% in a new operating system. The original mix design includes various materials that sum to 100%, but the new system requires recycled materials to be input as a separate total. To achieve this, users need to scale the percentages of recycled materials based on their proportion of the total mix. For example, if recycled materials make up 37% of the total, the original percentages must be adjusted to reflect that 2% becomes approximately 5.4% and 35% becomes about 94.6% of the recycled total. This method allows for accurate input into the new system while maintaining the integrity of the original mix design.
dspicher
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am new to forums in general, but here goes. i have found myself stumped over a basic math problem with a new operating system on an asphalt plant I operate. I am sure there is a simple forumla to solve this.

the mix design or "recipe" calls for percentages of stone and sand totaling 100 percent. so the design reads #8 gravel 20%, #8 limestone 18%, sand 5%, #12 limestone 18%, fines at 2%, recycled asphalt at 35% and recycled shingles at 2%.

i used to just type in the percentages on the mix computer and run the mix but on the new system my recycled products must equal 100 percent. so how do i express 37% of the recycle to equal 100%. so in my ignorance I used 95% recycled asphalt and 5% recycled shingles. (i came to this by multiplying 2.7 x 35 = 94.5 round up for a whole number 95%) this came about with trial. 2.5 no, 2.6 hmm not quite...

i hope this makes sense. try not to tear me apart because of my ignorance, lol. I have many skills but math seems to have slipped away as i grow older. its amazing what you lose if you become complacent. thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dspicher said:
Hi, I am new to forums in general, but here goes. i have found myself stumped over a basic math problem with a new operating system on an asphalt plant I operate. I am sure there is a simple forumla to solve this.

the mix design or "recipe" calls for percentages of stone and sand totaling 100 percent. so the design reads #8 gravel 20%, #8 limestone 18%, sand 5%, #12 limestone 18%, fines at 2%, recycled asphalt at 35% and recycled shingles at 2%.

i used to just type in the percentages on the mix computer and run the mix but on the new system my recycled products must equal 100 percent. so how do i express 37% of the recycle to equal 100%. so in my ignorance I used 95% recycled asphalt and 5% recycled shingles. (i came to this by multiplying 2.7 x 35 = 94.5 round up for a whole number 95%) this came about with trial. 2.5 no, 2.6 hmm not quite...

i hope this makes sense. try not to tear me apart because of my ignorance, lol. I have many skills but math seems to have slipped away as i grow older. its amazing what you lose if you become complacent. thanks

Hi dspicher, welcome to MHB.

I understand that you have certain ingredients for your mix, which total up to 100%. That's fine.

But then I'm not sure what it is you are asking. Are you saying you have to change your mix so that all of your ingredients are now recycled?
 
The mix design will remain the same but it will be broken into 2 parts. Recycled material and virgin material. the new computer program needs it entered as 100% recycled and 100% virgin material totals.

So just for example 37% of the total mix is recycle but i have to enter this to total 100%

2% becomes 5% and 35% becomes 95% to make up 100 percent of my recycle feeders.

Then I do the same with the 63% virgin material. The program needs to see 100% total. So i do the same crude "expansion" .

I think this will help explain.
 
dspicher said:
The mix design will remain the same but it will be broken into 2 parts. Recycled material and virgin material. the new computer program needs it entered as 100% recycled and 100% virgin material totals.

So just for example 37% of the total mix is recycle but i have to enter this to total 100%

2% becomes 5% and 35% becomes 95% to make up 100 percent of my recycle feeders.

Then I do the same with the 63% virgin material. The program needs to see 100% total. So i do the same crude "expansion" .

I think this will help explain.

To scale the numbers up, divide by the portion of the total. For example:

$$\frac{2\%}{.37}=\frac{200}{37}\%\approx5.405405405405405\%$$

$$\frac{35\%}{.37}=\frac{3500}{37}\%\approx94.5945945945946\%$$
 
Eureka. Thats what i wanted to learn. Thank you very much. I hope I can repay the favor some day.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top