Solving Physics on Own: Horizontal Force for Blocks

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the horizontal force needed to keep two blocks stationary relative to a larger block on a frictionless surface. The user initially questions why the total force includes all three masses (M, M1, and M2) instead of just M and M1, arguing that M2 should not be affected by the applied force. Responses clarify that all blocks must share the same acceleration to remain stationary relative to each other, necessitating the inclusion of M2 in the calculations. The application of Newton's second law is emphasized, confirming that the tension in the rope and gravitational forces must be accounted for in the overall force equation. Ultimately, the user acknowledges a misunderstanding and recognizes the necessity of including all masses in the force calculation.
Joran Verlaeck
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear Forum Users,

I am studying physics on my own, i am new to this forum, i am working every example in the book and i have a question. I hope that you are so kind to give me an explanation so that i can continue my chapter exercises.

The question of the book is : What horizontal force must be applied to a large block of mass M shown in Figure P5.67 so that the tan blocks remain stationary relative to M ? Assume all surfaces and the pulley are frictionless. (Notice that the force exerted by the string accelerates M1)

See attachement for picture.

The calculation goes as follows.

M1*g - T = 0 =>
T = M2 * a =>
M1*g = M2 * a => a = (M1*g)/(M2)
F = TotalMass * a => in the book and on the internet the result is
F = (M + M1 + M2) * (M1*g) / (M2)

What i was wondering is if M1 is not connected by the string with M2, and the surface is frictionless, normally only block M would slide together with M1 and M2 would remain stationary and eventually fall off. The tension in the robe is provided by the gravitational force, no gravity
no tension. So in the end result F only needs to accelerate M and M1 and not M2 because that
is accelerated by gravity -> equation a = M1 * G / M2.

So why is the result (M + M1 + M2) * (M1*g) / (M2) and not (M + M1) * (M1*g) / (M2).
Because F is not responsible to give M2 that acceleration just for keeping M relative to M2 in rest.
So they both need the same acceleration.

Can you please help me with this reasoning.
Thx

Jöran
 

Attachments

  • Picture.png
    Picture.png
    7.4 KB · Views: 1,906
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Jöran! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Joran Verlaeck said:
So why is the result (M + M1 + M2) * (M1*g) / (M2) and not (M + M1) * (M1*g) / (M2).
Because F is not responsible to give M2 that acceleration just for keeping M relative to M2 in rest.
So they both need the same acceleration.

I see what you mean.

But no, for two reasons:

i] suppose the three masses were fixed to each other …

the result would be the same, wouldn't it? :wink:

ii] this is an exercise in applying Newton's second law …

you must always apply it to all the external forces on a particular body (or bodies)

if you apply it to M and M1 combined, then you must include the external force (on M and M1) from the horizontal part of the rope …

(M + M1)a = F - T = F - M2a,

ie (M + M1 + M2)a = F :smile:
 
Joran Verlaeck said:
Dear Forum Users,

I am studying physics on my own, i am new to this forum, i am working every example in the book and i have a question. I hope that you are so kind to give me an explanation so that i can continue my chapter exercises.

The question of the book is : What horizontal force must be applied to a large block of mass M shown in Figure P5.67 so that the tan blocks remain stationary relative to M ? Assume all surfaces and the pulley are frictionless. (Notice that the force exerted by the string accelerates M1)

See attachement for picture.

The calculation goes as follows.

M1*g - T = 0 =>
T = M2 * a =>
M1*g = M2 * a => a = (M1*g)/(M2)
F = TotalMass * a => in the book and on the internet the result is
F = (M + M1 + M2) * (M1*g) / (M2)

What i was wondering is if M1 is not connected by the string with M2, and the surface is frictionless, normally only block M would slide together with M1 and M2 would remain stationary and eventually fall off. The tension in the robe is provided by the gravitational force, no gravity
no tension. So in the end result F only needs to accelerate M and M1 and not M2 because that
is accelerated by gravity -> equation a = M1 * G / M2.

So why is the result (M + M1 + M2) * (M1*g) / (M2) and not (M + M1) * (M1*g) / (M2).
Because F is not responsible to give M2 that acceleration just for keeping M relative to M2 in rest.
So they both need the same acceleration.

Can you please help me with this reasoning.
Thx

Jöran
attachment.php?attachmentid=58211&d=1366920100.png


Hello Joran Verlaeck. Welcome to PF !If m1 and m2 are stationary relative M, then they all have the same acceleration, call it a .

So the net force, F, on the system must be such that F = (m1 + m2 + M)a . It's simply the application of Newton's 2ND Law of Motion.
 
Last edited:
Joran Verlaeck said:
in the end result F only needs to accelerate M and M1 and not M2 because that is accelerated by gravity -> equation a = M1 * G / M2.
F is not responsible to give M2 that acceleration just for keeping M relative to M2 in rest.
T = m1g = m2a. At the pulley, the string exerts a force T vertically and horizontally on M. The horizontal forces on M are therefore F, m1a from contact with m1 and m2a from the pulley.
 
All of you guys,

Thanks for presenting me the reasoning why this is the case.
After i read the responses i released that i made a mistake by following my reasoning.
I was thinking of the same physics situation only this time m1 rests on the floor, the outcome is like tiny-tim suggested the same. If so M1 feel the normal force and in reality there is really no tension in the robe, but once the object starts moving, and we want to make sure that M2 has no velocity relative to M, the tension in the robe gets m2.a and if a is exactly m1*g/m2 the normal force on m1 is zero. In this case you can see that F must be responsible to the motion of M2 and all the equations remains the same.

Thanks for answering this topic.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K