Solving Poisson Process Problem: Probability of Mis-Diagnosis

  • Thread starter Thread starter ankitj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
ankitj
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am stuck on the problem below. I think it has something to do with Poisson Process??
I would really appreciate it if someone could point me in the right direction.

An electronic switching device occasionally malfunctions and may need to be replaced. It is known that the device is satisfactory if it makes, on average no more than .2 errors per hour. A particular five hour period is chosen as a “test” on the device. If no more than 1 error occurs, the device is considered satisfactory. What is the probability that a satisfactory device will be mis- diagnosed as “unsatisfactory” on the basis of the test?

Thanks
AJ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This has to do with the Poisson Distribution. First you need to figure the mean and the variance of the distribution for the 5-hour period, then calculate the "tail" probability beyond 1.
 
Is this correct?

λ = 5*0.2 = 1
P(x>1) = 1-P(x<=1) = 1-(P(x=0) + P(x=1)) = 0.2642

Thanks
AJ
 
The question seems strangely worded. The problem indicates that the machine has an expected error rate of 0.2/hr. Then it asks for the probability that it will be "misdiagnosed" as unsatisfactory. The probability it is misdiagnosed may have nothing to do with whether the machine malfuctions. Bad choice of words in my opinion. I suspect what the question is getting at is if X is a random variable that counts the number of errors in the 5-hour window, then what is the probability that X is more than 1.

This is a Poisson distributed random variable (as has been mentioned). The probability distribution function for a Poisson variable with expected rate per unit interval \lambda is:

P(X=n)=\frac{(\lambda t)^n e^{-\lambda t}}{n!}\text{ for }n=0,1,2,3,\dots

where t is the length of the interval over which X is measured.

Here you have \lambda=0.2\text{ and }t=5 and you're looking for

P(X&gt;1)=1-P(x\leq1)=1-P(X=0)-P(X=1).

You should be able to navigate from here.

--Elucidus
 
Thank you very much for your help. Seems like i was on the right track.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top