Solving Police Car Overtaking Motorbike Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ax3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a police car accelerating to overtake a speeding motorbike. The motorbike travels at a constant speed of 35 m/s, while the police car accelerates at 4 m/s². The solution requires calculating the distance the police car travels before overtaking the motorbike, which is 613 meters, and the time it takes to do so, which is 17.5 seconds. The initial attempts to solve the problem using the suvat equations were challenging, particularly in understanding the relationship between the velocities of both vehicles. Ultimately, the participant found clarity in the approach needed to solve the problem.
Ax3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A speeding motorbike travels past a stationary police car at a speed of 35ms-1. The police car starts accelerating immediately at 4ms-2, and keeps accelerating at this rate until it has passed the bike.

- How far has does the police car travel before it overtakes the motorbike? (Ans=613m)
- At what time does the police car overtake the motorbike? (Ans=17.5s)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried using a suvat equation, namely v=u+at to calculate the time taken for the police car to catch up to the motorbike (where i use v=35), however obviously the police car will never catch up to the bike if it only matches its velocity.. I'm really unsure of what to do next because trial and error using suvat equations has not provided me with much assistance.

Thanks in advance for any help! (Im just after some clarification as the steps i would need to take/variables i would need to identify in order to answer a question similar to this)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hint: write down the expression for the distance traveled by both vehicles.
 


Thanks heaps radou! i figured it out
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top