Solving Prove: na < b & (n+1)a > b with No a Dividing b

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ceci020
  • Start date Start date
Ceci020
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
** Homework Statement
Question is to prove:
If 1 < a < b and if a does not divide b
then there exists n in N such that na < b and (n+1)a > b

** My thoughts:
Since a does not divide b for 1 < a < b, I want to refer to the Euclidean algorithm, so:
b = q1 * a + r1 for r1 is the first remainder, and r1 < a

But then I get lost on where to go from here. Actually I thought of using induction for my proof, where I define a set S = {n in N such that na < b and (n+1)a > b}. But when I do the 2nd claim: if n in S, then n+1 in S, I think I find a contradiction because when replace n+1 to n for the first part of the def. of S, (n+1)a < b is false.

So could someone please give me some hints on how should I proceed?
Thank you very much for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you have the Euclidean algorithm, then use it! Pick n=q1. n*a<b right? Why is (n+1)*a>b?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top