Solving Separable Least Square Problem - Isy

  • Thread starter Thread starter isolde_isy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Separable Square
AI Thread Summary
To solve the separable least squares problem min(||Aax-b||2), where A is a known matrix and b is a known vector, isolating the unknown scalar a from the unknown vector x is challenging without specific constraints. The discussion suggests reformulating the problem with a constraint, such as ||x||=1, to facilitate finding a solution. However, this approach introduces ambiguity, as both a and -a can yield valid solutions corresponding to x and -x. Therefore, while a constrained least squares formulation can be applied, it does not eliminate the inherent duality in the solutions. The key takeaway is that additional constraints or properties are necessary to uniquely determine a and x.
isolde_isy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi I have to solve the following LSQ problem:
min(||Aax-b||2)

where
A is a known matrix,
b is a know vector
x is an unknows vector
a is an unknown scalar

I can solve directly via pseudo inverse
ax=inv(A'A)A'b
but how can I isolate a from x?

Could Separable least square a scheme to follow...
Thnaks in advance
Isy :smile:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Unless you have some particularly property (for example the magnitude of x = 1), you can't "separate" a from x. Your solution is a vector.
 
So it can be reformulate the problem in lsq constrained
min(||Aax-b||2)
subject to ||x||=1

Right?
Thanks Isy
 
isolde_isy said:
So it can be reformulate the problem in lsq constrained
min(||Aax-b||2)
subject to ||x||=1

Right?
Thanks Isy
Yes - but note that there would (for real vector spaces) be two possibilities, since a and -a, associated with x and -x would satisfy.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top