A Solving Spin-Spin Interaction for Total Spin Commutation

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Diracobama2181
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction
Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
How do I go about showing that the total Spin component commutes with the hamiltonian
Let there be four spin (1/2) particles at the corners of a tetrahedron, coupled such that the total hamiltonian is given by $$H=\sum_{i\neq j} S_{i} \cdot S_{J}$$.
How would I go about showing that each component of the total spin $$\sum_{i} S_{i}$$ commutes with the hamiltonian.

Work so far:
I know
$$\sum_{i} S_{i}^{x}=S_{1}^{x}+S_{2}^{x}+S_{3}^{x}+S_{4}^{x}$$
so $$[\sum_{i} S_{i}^{x},H]=[S_{1}^{x},H]+[S_{2}^{x},H]+[S_{3}^{x},H]+[S_{4}^{x},H]$$
From there, I can use $$H=S_{1}S_{2}+S_{1}S_{3}+S_{1}S_{4}+S_{2}S_{3}+S_{2}S_{4}+S_{3}S_{4}$$
I can also use $$S_{i}\cdot S_{j}=S_{i}^{x}S_{j}^{x}+S_{i}^{y}S_{j}^{y}+S_{i}^{z}S_{j}^{z}$$

As you can see, it gets rather messy. I just want to know if my reasoning is correct thus far and or if I am over complicating my solution.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A:Yes, you are on the right track. What you need to do is expand out the commutator:$$[\sum_i S_i^x,H]=\sum_{i \neq j}[S_i^x,S_i\cdot S_j] + [S_j^x,S_i\cdot S_j].$$Using the fact that $[S_i^x,S_i\cdot S_j] = 0$ (this follows from the definition of the dot product and the fact that $S^x$ is linear in $S$), we see that the above equals$$[\sum_i S_i^x,H] = \sum_{i\neq j}[S_j^x,S_i\cdot S_j].$$Now using the fact that for any two $2\times 2$ matrices $A,B$ we have $[A,B]= AB - BA$, we can expand out the commutator on the right hand side to get$$[\sum_i S_i^x,H] = \sum_{i\neq j}(S_i\cdot S_j S_j^x - S_j^x S_i\cdot S_j).$$Finally, using the fact that $S^x$ is hermitian, we see that the above equals$$[\sum_i S_i^x,H] = \sum_{i\neq j}(S_i\cdot S_j S_j^x - S_i\cdot S_j S_j^x) = 0.$$The same argument can be applied to show that $[\sum_i S_i^y,H] = 0$ and $[\sum_i S_i^z,H] = 0$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top