Solving Static Equilibrium: Ʃτ = 0, ƩF = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter capn awesome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equlibrium Static
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving static equilibrium problems using the equations Ʃτ = 0 and ƩF = 0. The user derived the relationship between mass (M), moment of inertia (I), and angle (ψ) through torque analysis, resulting in the equation ψ = tan-1(ML/mI). The user expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their solution and seeks alternative methods for finding the angle without directly considering torque. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding both torque and static equilibrium principles in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with torque calculations
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically tangent
  • Basic grasp of moment of inertia concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the lever equation and its applications in static equilibrium
  • Explore advanced torque analysis techniques in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between mass, moment of inertia, and angular displacement
  • Review problem-solving strategies for static equilibrium scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and static equilibrium, as well as educators looking for effective teaching methods in these topics.

capn awesome
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
http://postimg.org/image/4ctmvwzx3/


Homework Equations



Ʃτ = 0
ƩF = 0


The Attempt at a Solution



summing the torques for each piece, i found

Ʃτ = MgLsin(90-ψ) - mgIsin(ψ) = 0

MgLsin(90-ψ) = mgIsin(ψ)

ML/mI = sin(ψ)/sin(90-ψ) = sin(ψ)/cos(-ψ) = tan(ψ)

so ψ = tan-1(ML/mI)

i don't know if this is correct or not...

and I have no idea how I could find the angle without considering torque. any help is appreciated. thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • ps1b.gif
    ps1b.gif
    4.9 KB · Views: 542
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't know if this is correct or not...
How could you go about checking it?

and I have no idea how I could find the angle without considering torque.
I don't think you can. But you can do it without directly considering torque by using a result - like the lever equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K