Solving Summation Using Induction: 1/((k-1)!(k+1)) < 1/k!

  • Thread starter Thread starter topengonzo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a summation inequality involving factorials, specifically the expression \(\sum_{k}^{n} \frac{1}{(k-1)!(k+1)} < \frac{1}{k!}\) using mathematical induction. Participants are exploring the validity of the summation and its interpretation in the context of induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the induction variable and the limits of the summation, with some suggesting alternative interpretations of the summation limits. Questions arise about the necessity of using induction versus direct computation of the series.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and alternative approaches. There is a recognition that induction may not be the most effective method for this problem, and some participants are exploring the implications of taking limits as \(n\) approaches infinity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are encouraged to show their work as part of the homework guidelines, and there is a mention of a related question regarding the representation of positive rational numbers using factorial series.

topengonzo
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
summation from k to n of 1/((k-1)!(k+1)) < 1/k! using induction

How can i write it to look math
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have 2 integer variables, k and n. What is the induction variable?
 
mathman said:
You have 2 integer variables, k and n. What is the induction variable?

n is induction variable and base term is n=k
 
When you said "summation from k to n", I assume you meant "summation from 1 to n". For all induction problems, keep in mind that the goal is to prove infinitely many statements with a finite amount of work. If we for each positive integer n denote the nth statement by P(n), the goal is to prove P(1), P(2), P(3) and so on, by only proving the following statements:

P(1)
For all positive integers j, if P(j), then P(j+1).
 
I assume the summation is from j to n, and that it ends with < 1/j! . It is not necessary to state the induction variable, but it is the lower limit j. It is btw much easier to just compute the sum without any induction nonsense.
 
topengonzo said:
summation from k to n of 1/((k-1)!(k+1)) < 1/k! using induction

How can i write it to look math
This is how I would interpret what you wrote:
[tex]\sum_{r=k}^n \frac 1 {(k-1)!(k+1)} < \frac 1 {k!}[/tex]
This is "the sum from k to n of 1/((k-1)!(k+1))" -- and it is false.This is what I think you meant:
[tex]\sum_{r=k}^n \frac 1 {(r-1)!(r+1)} < \frac 1 {k!}[/tex]
This is true for all finite integers k>0, n≥k. You don't need recursion to prove this.
 
This is how I would interpret what you wrote:
∑r=kn1(k−1)!(k+1)<1k!

This is "the sum from k to n of 1/((k-1)!(k+1))" -- and it is false.This is what I think you meant:
∑r=kn1(r−1)!(r+1)<1k!

This is true for all finite integers k>0, n≥k. You don't need recursion to prove this.

Yes the second one you wrote is what i exactly mean. How do I prove it? Also I think if i set n -> infinity (find lim at infinity), I would get = instead of < . Am I correct?
 
topengonzo said:
Yes the second one you wrote is what i exactly mean. How do I prove it? Also I think if i set n -> infinity (find lim at infinity), I would get = instead of < . Am I correct?
This is the homework section of PhysicsForums. You need to show some work.

I will give a hint: Induction is not the way to go here. Simply find the value of the series.
 
D H said:
This is the homework section of PhysicsForums. You need to show some work.

I will give a hint: Induction is not the way to go here. Simply find the value of the series.

This is not the question of my homework. I will write it here down to show you that I am doing an effort and what I am asking will lead me to the answer.

Question:
Prove every positive rational number x can be expressed in ONE way in the form
x= a1 + a2/2! + a3/3! + ... + ak/k!
where a1,a2,...,ak are integers and 0<=a1,0<=a2<2,...,0<=ak<k
My solution:
To prove that there is only 1 solution, I am trying to prove
min(ak/k!)>max( (a(k+1))/(k+1)!+(a(k+2))/(k+2)!+...+ (a(k+n))/(k+n)! )
To get min set ak=1
and to get max set ak=k

and I get to the original question I am asking
 
  • #10
I'll give you a start. We agree that you are trying to prove
[tex]\sum_{r=k}^n \frac 1 {(r-1)!(r+1)} < \frac 1 {k!}[/tex]
Multiplying each term of the sum by one won't change anything, but write one as r/r.
 
  • #11
I think that your previous answer using series will solve it.

I am thinking of putting

[tex]\sum_{r=k}^n \frac r {(r+1)!} < \frac 1 {k!}[/tex]



and I use the poisson distribution series to prove = 1/k! and thus the sum of any finite terms of the series is < 1/k!

Am I correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
You're thinking too hard. Just rewrite the series so the sum goes from k+1 to n+1.
 
  • #13
[tex]\sum_{r=k+1}^{n+1} \frac {r-1} {(r)!} < \frac 1 {k!}[/tex]
Is this correct?
[tex]\sum_{r=0}^{inf} \frac {r-1} {(r)!}[/tex] = e-e=0

And then I take out term from 0 to k?
 
  • #14
topengonzo said:
[tex]\sum_{r=k+1}^{n+1} \frac {r-1} {(r)!} < \frac 1 {k!}[/tex]
Is this correct?
Yes!

[tex]\sum_{r=0}^{inf} \frac {r-1} {(r)!}[/tex] = e-e=0

And then I take out term from 0 to k?
No!

You are thinking too hard! Look at the numerator. Rewrite that finite sum as the difference between two sums. Those two sums will have n-1 common terms. Get rid of them.
 
  • #15
[tex]\sum_{r=k+1}^{n+1} \frac {1} {(r-1)!} - \sum_{r=k+1}^{n+1} \frac {1} {(r)!}[/tex]

YOUR RIGHT! it becomes simply
[tex]\frac {1} {(k)!} - \frac {1} {(n+1)!}[/tex]

Just 1 final question?

Prove every positive rational number x can be expressed in ONE way in the form
x= a1 + a2/2! + a3/3! + ... + ak/k!
where a1,a2,...,ak are integers and 0<=a1,0<=a2<2,...,0<=ak<k

I take lim as n tends to infinity of my answer so I get that the infinite sum of all terms after ak/k! is equal to ak/k! which means there is no overlapping and one and only one way to represent x.
Also the sum of fractions span from 0 to infinity which means EVERY positive rational number x can be represented by the sum of fractions
 
  • #16
Is my solution correct and is there another way to solve it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K