Solving System of Linear Equations: x_2 Free Variable?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the identification of x_2 as a free variable in a system of linear equations. It is noted that x_2 does not appear in the equations, leading to the conclusion that it does not exist within the context of this system. Participants suggest that x_2 can be treated as an arbitrary real number or simply omitted from the solution set. The conversation also touches on the geometric interpretation of the system, comparing it to a cylinder in higher dimensions. Ultimately, the presence of x_2 does not alter the fundamental properties of the solution space.
Panphobia
Messages
435
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


|1 0-1-2-8 | -3|
|0 0 1 2 7 | 1|
|0 0 0 1 -4 | -13|


I think that x_{2} is a free variable, so when writing the general solution in a solution set, what would I put for it? Nothing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Panphobia said:

Homework Statement


|1 0-1-2-8 | -3|
|0 0 1 2 7 | 1|
|0 0 0 1 -4 | -13|


I think that x_{2} is a free variable, so when writing the general solution in a solution set, what would I put for it? Nothing?
You could say that x2 is arbitrary or you could say that x2 = t, an arbitrary real number.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh ok thanks for that, I got it.
 
Panphobia said:

Homework Statement


|1 0-1-2-8 | -3|
|0 0 1 2 7 | 1|
|0 0 0 1 -4 | -13|


I think that x_{2} is a free variable, so when writing the general solution in a solution set, what would I put for it? Nothing?

When you write out the equations in detail you see that there is no ##x_2## anywhere in the system. I would not put anything for it; it does not "exist" for this system, no more than ##x_{17}## or ##x_{265}## exist here. However, I suppose you *could* argue the point.
 
Ray Vickson said:
When you write out the equations in detail you see that there is no ##x_2## anywhere in the system. I would not put anything for it; it does not "exist" for this system, no more than ##x_{17}## or ##x_{265}## exist here. However, I suppose you *could* argue the point.

I would say ##x^2+y^2=1## in ##R^3## represents a cylinder. Saying it's a circle in the plane because z doesn't occur isn't really a good answer.
 
Dick said:
I would say ##x^2+y^2=1## in ##R^3## represents a cylinder. Saying it's a circle in the plane because z doesn't occur isn't really a good answer.

I agree, but in the case herein, the "appropriate" view depends on what space you want to operate in.

In ##\mathbb{R}^5## the component ##x_2## is arbitrary, so the described "figure" is like a cylinder parallel to the 2-axis. However, we can look at the problem instead in ##\mathbb{R}^3##, where the problem is to represent the (column) vector ##(-3,1,-13)^T## as a linear combination of the 3-dimensional vectors in columns 1--5. The second column is the zero vector, so would have no effect at all on anything in the problem. Having an extraneous ##x_2## does not change the geometry in any way.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top