Solving Tension Problem with 3 Cables | Philip

  • Thread starter Thread starter philipc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cables Tension
AI Thread Summary
Philip encountered difficulties solving a tension problem involving a weight supported by three cables, initially relying on a TI-89 calculator to manage nine equations and unknowns. He sought advice on alternative approaches, particularly regarding the use of equilibrium conditions and the angles of the cables. After discussion, it was clarified that only three equations are needed if the angles are known, simplifying the problem significantly. Philip ultimately resolved the issue by focusing on the three tensions as unknowns and using vector sums to create the necessary equations. This method proved to be more efficient and effective for solving the tension problem.
philipc
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit stuck on a tension problem, I have a weight supported by three cables.
I will have to admit, up to this point, I have been cheating on these tension problems. What I have been doing is writing various equations and using my TI-89 to solve the system of equations. This method has been working for me when having only two cables or the three cables being some what symmetric. This problem puts the three cables all on the X, Z plane (judging by the picture) but they have no symmetry beyond that. Using my method I have nine unknowns, so I created to what I believed to be 9 valid equations, but my TI-89 didn't really like that.
I once remember my professor talking about some sort of triangle, so my question, is there a better way to solve this sort of problem. I'm not asking for the problem to be solved, I just need a different approach.
Thanks guys and gals
Philip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get the needed equations, consider the conditions for equilibrium: The sum of the forces in any direction must be zero; the net torque about any point must be zero.

If you really have 9 equations and 9 unknowns, what's the problem? Solve it, step by step. (To get more targeted advice, show the exact problem and your attempted solution.)
 
Doc,
I was just wondering if there was a different approach that using 9 equations, some general laws I'm missing out on.
To show the exact problem would be much harder than describing it, it's pretty simple, just imagine a mass hanging from three cables, and there three cables can be attached any where on the x,z plane. Where the mass is attached to the three cables on the negative y axis.
Far as my 9 equations, I'm guessing that I went down a wrong path, giving me incomplete data for the TI-89 to work with.
Setting the three separate x,y,z tensions equal only gives me three equations. What would be the next approach to obtain the next 6 equations?
Thanks
Philip
 
If you have the angles that the cables make, then all you probably need are three equations. (The tensions are the three unknowns.) If you don't have the angles, then you don't have enough information to solve for the tensions.
 
I just solved it, thanks
I do have the locations of the points where the cables are attached, so I can make the angles. What I was doing was breaking each tension into 3 parts giving me 9 unknowns. I found a similar problems solved where they only used the three tensions as unknowns and used the sum of each i,j,k vector to make 3 equations. This method was much easier and giving only three unknowns, so it all worked out in the end.
Thanks again
Philip
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top